Effects of effluent recirculation on two-stage anaerobic digestion in treatment of biodegradable municipal solid waste

被引:1
|
作者
Dinh, P. V. [1 ]
Fujiwara, T. [2 ]
Peni, A. N. [3 ]
Tran, C. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Dept Environm Technol & Management, 55 Giai Phong Rd, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Environm & Life Sci, Dept Environm Sci, 3-1-1 Tsushima, Kita, Okayama, Japan
[3] Bandung Inst Technol, Bandung, Indonesia
关键词
Biodegradable solid waste; Fermentation; Recirculation; Two-stage anaerobic digestion; ORGANIC LOADING RATE; METHANE PRODUCTION; VEGETABLE WASTE; PERFORMANCE; SLUDGE; HYDROLYSIS; PH;
D O I
10.22034/GJESM.2023.09.SI.03
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advantages such as high stability and high biogas production when recirculating the effluent stream in two-stage anaerobic digestion systems have been demonstrated on a variety of substrates, but there is limited information regarding the use of this practice on organic municipal waste. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how effluent recirculation affects the two-stage anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal solid waste. METHODS: Firstly, biodegradable municipal solid waste substrate was fermented under conditions of 12 percent initial total solids and a temperature of 36 degrees Celsius for 5 days. After that, the substrate continued to be diluted using tap water or the effluent stream with a rate of 2:1. In the case of using the effluent stream, the experiment was further performed with dilution rates of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:2. Then, the liquid part was collected and pumped into the methane reactor at an organic loading rate of 7.64 grams of total solids per liter per day at 36 degrees Celsius. The methane reactor was an up-flow reactor that contained both granular sludge and suspended sludge. The effectiveness of the experimental stages was evaluated through biogas production and chemical oxygen demand removal. FINDINGS: In the fermentative reactor, using the effluent stream to dilute solid-state feedstock helped keep the reactor stable at pH 5.5 without alkali addition. In the case of using tap water for dilution, it required a dose of 115.8 grams and 75.3 grams of sodium hydroxide per kilogram of volatile solids to attain pH conditions at 6.5 and 5.5, respectively. Maintaining the reactor at pH 6.5 increased the concentration of fermentation products compared to pH 5.5, including 5.9 percent total chemical oxygen demand, 5.5 percent soluble chemical oxygen demand, and 10.6 percent total volatile fatty acids. In the case of recirculating the effluent stream in the methane reactor, increasing the dilution rate from 0.5 to 3.0 resulted in a methane yield of 227.5-278.9 milliliter per gram of volatile solids and 85-93 percent chemical oxygen demand removal. The methane reactor's best digestion performance was attained at recirculation rate 2. Methane formation mainly occurred in granular sludge via the hydrogenotrophic pathway. Methane formation in suspended sludge occurred in a secondary manner, mainly via both the hydrogenotrophic and acetotrophic pathways. Among methanogen families, Methanobacteriaceae was found to have the highest relative abundance (7.5 percent in granular sludge and 0.8 percent in suspended sludge). CONCLUSION: Recirculating the effluent provided significant benefits, including the ability to stabilize the hydrolysis process and increase the methane yield. A recirculation rate of 2 to obtain a total chemical oxygen demand of 35.2 grams per liter was the best condition for methanogenesis. Acetotrophic methanogens were better adapted to difficult conditions than hydrogenotrophic methanogens. The formation of methane mainly occurred in granular sludge via a dominant hydrogenotrophic pathway. Methane formation in suspended sludge occurred in a secondary manner, mainly via both the hydrogenotrophic and acetotrophic pathways. Among methanogen families, Methanobacteriaceae was found to have the highest relative abundance.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Super blue box recycling (SUBBOR) enhanced two-stage anaerobic digestion process for recycling municipal solid waste: Laboratory pilot studies
    Vogt, G.M.
    Liu, H.W.
    Kennedy, K.J.
    Vogt, H.S.
    Holbein, B.E.
    Bioresource Technology, 2002, 85 (03) : 291 - 299
  • [42] Profile of hydrolases and biogas production during two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion of solid potato waste
    Parawira, W
    Murto, M
    Read, JS
    Mattiasson, B
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 40 (09) : 2945 - 2952
  • [43] ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE
    DASGUPTA, A
    NEMEROW, NL
    FAROOQ, S
    DALY, EL
    SENGUPTA, S
    GERRISH, HP
    WONG, KF
    BIOCYCLE, 1981, 22 (02) : 34 - 38
  • [44] Laboratory simulation of anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste
    Ledakowicz, S
    Kaczorek, K
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 39 (04): : 859 - 871
  • [45] ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE
    STENSTROM, MK
    NG, AS
    BHUNIA, PK
    ABRAMSON, SD
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1983, 109 (05): : 1148 - 1158
  • [46] ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE
    CECCHI, F
    MARCOMINI, A
    PAVAN, P
    FAZZINI, G
    MATAALVAREZ, J
    BIOCYCLE, 1990, 31 (06) : 42 - 43
  • [47] Laboratory Simulation of Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste
    Ledakowicz, S. (standleda@p.lodz.pl), 1600, Marcel Dekker Inc. (39):
  • [48] The Municipal Solid Waste Management System with Anaerobic Digestion
    Seruga, Przemyslaw
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (08)
  • [49] Biohythane Production from Co-Digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent with Solid Residues by Two-Stage Solid State Anaerobic Digestion Process
    Suksong, Wantanasak
    Kongjan, Prawit
    O-Thong, Sompong
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2015, 79 : 943 - 949
  • [50] Distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion - Effects of leachate recirculation and pH adjustment
    Vavilin, VA
    Rytov, SV
    Lokshina, JY
    Pavlostathis, SG
    Barlaz, MA
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2003, 81 (01) : 66 - 73