Convolutional neural network-based automated maxillary alveolar bone segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images

被引:31
|
作者
Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gerhardt, Mauricio do Nascimento [1 ,4 ]
Picoli, Fernando Fortes [1 ,5 ]
Van Gerven, Adriaan [6 ]
Nomidis, Stefanos [6 ]
Willems, Holger [6 ]
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz [3 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Div Oral Radiol, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Pontif Catholic Univ Rio Grande Do Sul, Fac Dent, Sch Hlth Sci, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Dept Dent, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[6] Relu BV, Leuven, Belgium
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
alveolar crest; artificial intelligence; cone-beam computed tomography; dental implant; jaw bone; maxilla; neural networks; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ACCURACY; CBCT;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14063
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop and assess the performance of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-driven convolutional neural network (CNN)-based tool for automated three-dimensional (3D) maxillary alveolar bone segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and MethodsA total of 141 CBCT scans were collected for performing training (n = 99), validation (n = 12), and testing (n = 30) of the CNN model for automated segmentation of the maxillary alveolar bone and its crestal contour. Following automated segmentation, the 3D models with under- or overestimated segmentations were refined by an expert for generating a refined-AI (R-AI) segmentation. The overall performance of CNN model was assessed. Also, 30% of the testing sample was randomly selected and manually segmented to compare the accuracy of AI and manual segmentation. Additionally, the time required to generate a 3D model was recorded in seconds (s). ResultsThe accuracy metrics of automated segmentation showed an excellent range of values for all accuracy metrics. However, the manual method (95% HD: 0.20 +/- 0.05 mm; IoU: 95% +/- 3.0; DSC: 97% +/- 2.0) showed slightly better performance than the AI segmentation (95% HD: 0.27 +/- 0.03 mm; IoU: 92% +/- 1.0; DSC: 96% +/- 1.0). There was a statistically significant difference of the time-consumed among the segmentation methods (p < .001). The AI-driven segmentation (51.5 +/- 10.9 s) was 116 times faster than the manual segmentation (5973.3 +/- 623.6 s). The R-AI method showed intermediate time-consumed (1666.7 +/- 588.5 s). ConclusionAlthough the manual segmentation showed slightly better performance, the novel CNN-based tool also provided a highly accurate segmentation of the maxillary alveolar bone and its crestal contour consuming 116 times less than the manual approach.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography
    Baysal, Asli
    Uysal, Tancan
    Veli, Ilknur
    Ozer, Torun
    Karadede, Irfan
    Hekimoglu, Seyit
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 43 (02) : 83 - 95
  • [22] Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors
    Wei, Diyang
    Zhang, Lingyun
    Li, Weiran
    Jia, Yilin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [23] Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Kasaven, C. P.
    Ivekovic, S.
    McIntyre, G. T.
    Gillgrass, T.
    Thomson, D. A.
    Menhinick, A.
    Mossey, P. A.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2013, 50 (06): : E115 - E120
  • [24] Analysis of the root position and angulation of maxillary premolars in alveolar bone using cone-beam computed tomography
    Jung, Yun-Hoa
    Cho, Bong-Hae
    Hwang, Jae-Joon
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2022, 52 (04) : 365 - 373
  • [25] Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images
    Sun, Zongyang
    Smith, Tharon
    Kortam, Sahira
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    Tee, Boon Ching
    Fieldse, Henry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (02) : e117 - e127
  • [26] Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
    Tian, Yu-lou
    Liu, Fang
    Sun, Hong-jing
    Lv, Pin
    Cao, Yu-ming
    Yu, Mo
    Yue, Yang
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 45 (05) : 245 - 252
  • [27] Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Maxillary Sinusitis
    Maillet, Michelle
    Bowles, Walter R.
    McClanahan, Scott L.
    John, Mike T.
    Ahmad, Mansur
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2011, 37 (06) : 753 - 757
  • [28] Digital tooth-based superimposition method for assessment of alveolar bone levels on cone-beam computed tomography images
    Romero-Delmastro, Alejandro
    Kadioglu, Onur
    Currier, G. Frans
    Cook, Tanner
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 146 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [29] Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations
    Sun, Liangyan
    Zhang, Lina
    Shen, Guofang
    Wang, Bo
    Fang, Bing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 147 (03) : 313 - 323
  • [30] Analysis of the Morphology of Maxillary Sinus Septa on Reconstructed Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images
    Qian, Liang
    Tian, Xiao-mei
    Zeng, Li
    Gong, Yao
    Wei, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (04) : 729 - 737