Efficacy of skin-to-skin vs. cloth-to-cloth contact for thermoregulation in low birth weight newborns: a randomized crossover trial

Lay Summary Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) helps in maintaining optimum temperature of low birth weight (LBW) newborns. It is an important component of Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC), which is standard of care and reduces several neonatal morbidities and mortality. However, there are several barriers for the optimum utilization of KMC. One of the major barriers is privacy issues while putting newborn in SSC. To overcome this barrier for increasing KMC uptake, we innovatively thought of keeping the newborn on mother's chest without removing the cloths of both the mother and the newborn. We called it cloth-to-cloth contact (CCC). We compared SSC and CCC for temperature regulation in the newborns weighing between 1500 and 2499 g at the time of enrollment using a crossover design. We observed that mean temperature steadily increased in newborns while receiving SSC or CCC for 2 h. There were no significant differences in mean temperature readings between these two groups at various time points. Thus, CCC was not inferior to SSC in maintaining temperature. We did not observe any adverse effect of CCC. CCC may overcome the barrier of privacy issues of SSC. Thus, CCC was equally efficacious, safe and more feasible for maintaining thermoregulation in LBW newborns. Objective Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is effective to maintain normal temperature in low birth weight (LBW) newborns. However, there are several barriers related to privacy and space availability for its optimum utilization. We used cloth-to-cloth contact (CCC), i.e. placing the newborn in Kangaroo position without removing cloths as an innovative alternative to SSC to test its efficacy for thermoregulation and feasibility as compared to SSC in LBW newborns. Methods The newborns eligible for Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in step-down nursery were included in this randomized crossover trial. Newborns received SSC or CCC as per randomization on the first day and then crossed over to other group on the next day and so on. A feasibility questionnaire was asked to the mothers and the nurses. Axillary temperature was measured at various time intervals. Group comparisons were made by either using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test. Results A total of 23 newborns received KMC for total 152 occasions in the SSC group and 149 times in the CCC group. There was no significant temperature difference between the groups at any time-point. Mean (standard deviation) gain of temperature at 120 min in the CCC group [0.43 (0.34)degrees C] was comparable to the SSC group [0.49 (0.36)degrees C] (p = 0.13). We did not observe any adverse effect of CCC. Most mothers and nurses perceived CCC feasible in hospital settings and felt that it could be feasible in-home settings too. Conclusion CCC was safe, more feasible and not inferior to SSC for maintaining thermoregulation in LBW newborns.