Have the new round of agricultural land system reform improved farmers' agricultural inputs in China?

被引:10
|
作者
Gong, Maogang [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Yanan [1 ]
Zhang, Yun [1 ]
Elahi, Ehsan [1 ]
Yang, Yuanxi [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Zibo 255000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Technol, Marxism Sinicizat Res Ctr, Zibo 255000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sch Business, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
关键词
Land reforms; Three rights separation; Agricultural investment; Propensity Score Matching -Difference in Dif; ferences (PSM-DID); China; MATCHING ESTIMATORS; RIGHTS REFORM; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106825
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's modern socialist system completed the registration and certification of farmland ownership and continued to deepen the "separation of powers" reform at the end of 2020. This facilitated the transfer of land management rights and impacted investment in agricultural production. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the new round of agricultural land system reform on farmers' farm inputs in China's socialist system. The study uses data from the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS) and employs various econo-metric approaches, including the Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences (PSM-DID) method to approach the objectives of the study. The results indicate that the new round of agricultural land system reform significantly promotes the increase of farmers' inputs in agriculture, including the area of land transferred in and self-owned, income from agriculture, number of agricultural labors, and specialized agricultural production. The study suggests that the reform enhances the positive impact of land transferred-in on farmers' farm inputs. The impact of agricultural land confirmation and "three rights separation" is positive in eastern, central, and western China. The findings suggest that public authorities should continue to improve the efficiency of land allocation and large-scale operation, cultivate new agricultural operation bodies, and improve the level of agricultural production specialization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Founding Farmers Jefferson, Washington, and the Rhetoric of Agricultural Reform
    Sturges, Mark
    EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE, 2015, 50 (03) : 681 - 709
  • [23] Japanese Farmers in Flux The Domestic Sources of Agricultural Reform
    Maclachlan, Patricia L.
    Shimizu, Kay
    ASIAN SURVEY, 2016, 56 (03) : 442 - 465
  • [24] Research on the reform of agricultural science & technology system in West China
    Ye, Liu
    Hui, Xiong
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (3RD), VOL I, 2007, : 997 - 1004
  • [25] Agricultural extension system reform and agent time allocation in China
    Hu, Ruifa
    Yang, Zhijian
    Kelly, Peter
    Huang, Jikun
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 20 (02) : 303 - 315
  • [26] RURAL REFORM AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN CHINA
    WAKASHIRO, N
    DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 1990, 28 (04): : 482 - 502
  • [27] The design and implementation of a distributed agricultural service system for smallholder farmers in China
    Hua, Jing
    Wang, Haoyu
    Kang, Mengzhen
    Wang, Xiujuan
    Guo, Shaoxin
    Chang, Fangle
    Wang, Fei-Yue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [28] Land reform and interlocking agricultural markets in Moldova
    Spoor, Max
    Izman, Felicia
    POLITICAL ECONOMY OF RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: LAND, PEASANTS AND RURAL POVERTY IN TRANSITION, 2009, : 99 - 122
  • [29] Consolidation of agricultural land can contribute to agricultural sustainability in China
    Duan, Jiakun
    Ren, Chenchen
    Wang, Sitong
    Zhang, Xiuming
    Reis, Stefan
    Xu, Jianming
    Gu, Baojing
    NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (12): : 1014 - +
  • [30] Policy reform and agricultural land abandonment in the EU
    Renwick, Alan
    Jansson, Torbjorn
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Revoredo-Giha, Cesar
    Britz, Wolfgang
    Gocht, Alexander
    McCracken, Davy
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) : 446 - 457