ESG Disclosure and Firm Performance: An Asset-Pricing Approach

被引:9
|
作者
Khandelwal, Vinay [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sharma, Prashant [4 ]
Chotia, Varun [1 ]
机构
[1] Jaipuria Inst Management Jaipur, Jaipur 302033, India
[2] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] GLA Univ, Inst Business Management, Mathura 281406, India
[4] Jaipuria Inst Management Noida, Noida 201309, India
关键词
ESG disclosure; firm performance; asset pricing; sustainability; ESG; financial anomaly; factor models; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; MARKET EQUILIBRIUM; STOCK; RISK; EARNINGS; RETURN; ANOMALIES; PRICES; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3390/risks11060112
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Disclosing information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) parameters is voluntary for most firms across the world. Companies disclose their performance on ESG datapoints due to two main reasons-(i) to gain the trust of stakeholders through increased transparency and (ii) to comply with regulations imposed by governments and investment houses. Using a dataset of companies disclosing ESG parameters during 2014-2021 from the S & P BSE 500 index, this study investigates the role of ESG disclosure on firm performance. We divide the constituent securities into three factors-size, value, and disclosure to study the premiums generated by firms on each factor using single-, double-, and triple-sorting approaches. We utilize time series regressions along with GRS tests to empirically test the presence of factor premiums. We find the significant role of factors size, value, disclosure, and a dummy variable for the COVID-19 pandemic period to explain the portfolio returns. The study found a negative ESG disclosure premium stating that firms with high levels of disclosure earn less returns compared with the firms with less disclosures. The findings of this study contrast with multiple studies in the past that have found a positive disclosure premium. Our findings help reconcile the mixed evidence on the disclosure-returns relationship.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comment on: Are behavioral asset-pricing models structural?
    Wachter, JA
    JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2002, 49 (01) : 229 - 233
  • [22] Additional factor in asset-pricing: Institutional ownership
    Ugurlu-Yildirim, Ecenur
    Sendeniz-Yuncu, Ilkay
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [23] AN ASSET-PRICING THEORY UNIFYING THE CAPM AND APT
    WEI, KCJ
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1988, 43 (04): : 881 - 892
  • [24] Learning, asset-pricing tests, and market efficiency
    Lewellen, J
    Shanken, J
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03): : 1113 - 1145
  • [25] Bubble or riddle? An asset-pricing approach evaluation on China's housing market
    Feng, Qu
    Wu, Guiying Laura
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2015, 46 : 376 - 383
  • [26] ARBITRAGEUR BEHAVIOR IN SENTIMENT-DRIVEN ASSET-PRICING
    Kilic, Erdem
    Goksel, Oguzhan
    ANNALS OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 16 (03)
  • [27] Testing a production-based asset-pricing model
    Arroyo, CR
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1996, 34 (02) : 357 - 377
  • [28] Asset-pricing models: A case of Indian capital market
    Khudoykulov, Khurshid
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [29] Comparing consumption-based asset-pricing models
    Gordon, S
    Samson, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2002, 35 (03): : 586 - 610
  • [30] The conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies
    Lewellen, Jonathan
    Nagel, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 82 (02) : 289 - 314