Comparative Analysis of Methods for Somatic Cell Counting in Cow's Milk and Relationship between Somatic Cell Count and Occurrence of Intramammary Bacteria

被引:11
|
作者
Hisira, Vladimir [1 ]
Zigo, Frantisek [2 ]
Kadasi, Marian [1 ]
Klein, Robert [1 ]
Farkasova, Zuzana [2 ]
Vargova, Maria [3 ]
Mudron, Pavol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet Med & Pharm, Clin Ruminants, Kosice 04181, Slovakia
[2] Univ Vet Med & Pharm, Dept Nutr & Anim Husb, Kosice 04181, Slovakia
[3] Univ Vet Med & Pharm, Dept Environm Vet Legislat & Econ, Kosice 04181, Slovakia
关键词
mastitis; indirect method; pathogen; SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS; CLINICAL MASTITIS; DAIRY-COWS; DIAGNOSIS; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; INFECTIONS; COMPONENTS; LACTATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/vetsci10070468
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare three on-farm commercial methods for the indirect detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows: the California mastitis test (CMT), the Porta side somatic cell count milk test (Porta SCC), and the DeLaval cell counter (DCC), with the Fossomatic cell count (FSCC), and to evaluate the relationship between the determined somatic cell count SCC and the occurrence of intramammary pathogens in the milk of dairy cows. A total of 284 sensory unchanged mixed milk samples, collected during the milking on a dairy farm, were analyzed in this study for somatic cell counts by the mentioned on-farm tests. Quarter milk samples (n = 583) from all the selected cows were cultured. The agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the three indirect commercial diagnostic tests (the CMT, the Porta SCC, and the DeLaval cell counter) were calculated, and the FSCC was used as the gold standard. The results were analyzed statistically using the Pearson correlation test and the paired t-test. The CMT matched with the FSCC in 83.1% of the samples, with the Porta SCC in 80.6%, and with the DCC in 80.3% of the samples. The sensitivity and specificity reached 81.0% and 92.9% for the CMT, 79.4% and 90.7% for the Porta SCC, and 75.8% and 97.5% for the DCC, respectively. The correlation between the FSCC and the Porta SCC was 0.86 (p < 0.0001), and between the FSCC and the DCC, it was 0.92 (p < 0.0001). The differences between them were insignificant. Bacteria were detected in 130 (22.3%) quarter milk samples. The most prevalent bacteria were Enterococcus spp. (36.2%), followed by E. coli (20%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (13.1%), A. viridans (9.2%), Streptococcus spp. (9.2%), Proteus spp. (6.2%), and S. intermedius (3.9%). Contagious isolates (S. aureus) were detected in 3 quarter milk samples (2.3%). The agreement between the individual tests and the microbiological culture was as follows: 69.2% for the CMT; 73.7% for the Porta SCC; 71.6% for the DCC; and 76.5% for the FSCC. Higher SCCs were detected in the milk samples contaminated with bacteria than in the healthy milk (p < 0.001). No significance was found between the presence of individual species of intramammary pathogens and the different levels of SCCs. Based on the results, bacteria are the predominant cause of subclinical mastitis. The increased SCC of some milk samples with no presence of bacteria meant that the increase could have been caused by numerous other agents (viruses, fungi, or algae) or factors for mastitis in the dairy industry.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Somatic cell count in ewe milk
    Fthenakis, GC
    SOMATIC CELLS AND MILK OF SMALL RUMINANTS, 1996, (77): : 193 - 196
  • [32] A relationship between somatic cell count, polymorphic form of β4-defensin and susceptibility of cow milk fat to lipolysis
    Strzalkowska, Nina
    Jozwik, Artur
    Polawska, Ewa
    Zdanowska-Sasiadek, Zaneta
    Bagnicka, Emilia
    Pyzel, Bozena
    Lipinska, Paulina
    Horbanczuk, Jaroslaw O.
    ANIMAL SCIENCE PAPERS AND REPORTS, 2014, 32 (04): : 307 - 316
  • [33] Comparison of methods for measurement of somatic cell count in goat milk
    Zazharska, Nm
    JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 75 (03):
  • [34] Monitoring subclinical intramammary infections on a low bulk milk somatic cell count farm
    Hogeveen, H
    Sampimon, OC
    Hanekamp, WJA
    Sol, J
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL DIARY HOUSING CONFERENCE, 1998, : 9 - 16
  • [35] Evaluation of the composite milk somatic cell count as a predictor of intramammary infection in dairy cattle
    Jashari, R.
    Piepers, S.
    De Vliegher, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (11) : 9271 - 9286
  • [36] Comparison of Measuring Methods for Somatic Cell Count in Goat Milk
    Lee, Seung-Gyu
    Kim, Min-Kyung
    Lee, Yeon-Jeong
    Jeong, Seok-Geun
    Oh, Mi-Hwa
    Kim, Dong-Hun
    Park, Kwang-Wook
    Lee, Wan-Kyu
    Ham, Jun-Sang
    KOREAN JOURNAL FOR FOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES, 2010, 30 (01) : 120 - 123
  • [37] Association of Milk Somatic Cell Count with Bacteriological Cure of Intramammary Infection-A Review
    Williamson, Jenna
    Callaway, Todd
    Rollin, Emmanuel
    Ryman, Valerie
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [38] Monitoring nonlactating cow intramammary infection dynamics using DHI somatic cell count data
    Cook, NB
    Bennett, TB
    Emery, KM
    Nordlund, KV
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (05) : 1119 - 1126
  • [39] Relationship between somatic cell count of milk and special parameters of milk flow curves of cows
    Naumann, I
    Fahr, RD
    Von Lengerken, G
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 1998, 41 (03): : 237 - 250
  • [40] Reliability of the bulk milk somatic cell count as an indication of average herd somatic cell count
    Lievaart, Jan
    Barkema, Herman W.
    Hogeveen, Henk
    Kremer, Wim
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2009, 76 (04) : 490 - 496