Corporate sustainability and performance: An efficiency perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Erbetta, Fabrizio [1 ]
Bruno, Clementina [1 ]
Pirovano, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Econ & Business, Via Perrone 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
关键词
allocative efficiency; energy sector; renewables; trade-off paradigm; win-win paradigm; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFFS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; RENEWABLES; SYSTEM; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growing attention to corporate sustainability has favoured the emergence of paradigms aimed at understanding the interaction between the economic and the environmental sustainability dimensions. While a win-win paradigm initially arose basically aimed at emphasizing the potential synergies between these two objectives, an alternative vision based on a logic of trade-off has subsequently emerged, foreseeing that improvement in one perspective can often be harmful to the other. Focusing on the EU energy production industry, this study adopts a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with the aim to assess whether mutual impact there exists between the economic and the environmental sides reflecting a win-win or a trade-off relationship. Furthermore, as prioritizing sustainability indicators has been recognized in the ongoing debate as a useful way to build effective sustainability practices, our assessment of the mutual impact accommodates the possibility that the resulting evidence may change when priority is placed, alternatively, to the economic or the environmental sustainability concern. The results show how the environmental goal enters in a trade-off relationship with the economic one when priority is placed on the environmental dimension. This casts doubts on the feasibility of a spontaneous path towards the strengthening of renewable sources.
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2661
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    Patricio Romao, Bruno Jose
    de Barros Camara, Renata Paes
    REVISTA CONTABILIDADE E CONTROLADORIA-RC C, 2022, 14 (02): : 43 - 58
  • [22] The effect of supply chain learning on corporate sustainability performance: the perspective of ambidextrous innovation capability
    Sun, Jingke
    Xie, Xiongbiao
    Shi, Yangyan
    Zhou, Min
    Yan, Liang
    Venkatesh, Mani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023,
  • [23] Corporate Sustainability Performance of Chinese Firms: An Empirical Analysis from a Social Responsibility Perspective
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Lin, Haiying
    Tian, Maoxi
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (09) : 2027 - 2038
  • [24] Corporate Sustainability: Integrating Performance and Reporting
    De Silva, Tracy-Anne
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 27 (04) : 438 - 440
  • [25] The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance
    Peters, Gary F.
    Romi, Andrea M.
    Sanchez, Juan Manuel
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 159 (04) : 1065 - 1087
  • [26] CEO personality and corporate sustainability performance
    Venugopal, Ajith
    Nerur, Sridhar
    Yasar, Mahmut
    Rasheed, Abdul A.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2023, 61 (12) : 3691 - 3716
  • [27] Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance
    Oncioiu, Ionica
    Petrescu, Anca-Gabriela
    Bilcan, Florentina-Raluca
    Petrescu, Marius
    Popescu, Delia-Mioara
    Anghel, Elena
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [28] The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance
    Gary F. Peters
    Andrea M. Romi
    Juan Manuel Sanchez
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 159 : 1065 - 1087
  • [29] Corporate sustainability performance and informativeness of earnings
    Saini, Jagjit Singh
    Feng, Mingming
    DeMello, Jim
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2022, 37 (03) : 120 - 138
  • [30] Green Growth and Corporate Sustainability Performance
    Saufi, Nurul Awatif Ahmad
    Daud, Salina
    Hassan, Hasmaizan
    7TH INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS & BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (IEBMC 2015), 2016, 35 : 374 - 378