Assessment of Antarctic sea ice area and concentration in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 models

被引:12
|
作者
Casagrande, Fernanda [1 ,2 ]
Stachelski, Leticia [1 ]
de Souza, Ronald Buss [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Earth Syst Numer Modeling Div, Cachoeira Paulista, Brazil
[2] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Earth Syst Numer Modeling Div, Rod Presidente Dutra Km 40, BR-12630000 Cachoeira Paulista, Brazil
关键词
Antarctica; climate change; climate modelling; sea ice area; sea ice concentration; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; SOUTHERN-OCEAN; FRESH-WATER; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; CMIP5; TRENDS; FUTURE; EXTENT; SENSITIVITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1002/joc.7916
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Sea ice is an important and complex component of the Earth system and is considered a sensitive indicator of climate change. The seasonal sea ice cycle regulates the exchange of heat and salinity, altering the energy balance between high and low latitudes as well as the ocean and atmospheric circulation. The accurate representation of Antarctic sea ice has been considered a hot topic in the climate modelling community and lacks conclusive answers. In this paper, we evaluated the ability of 11 climate models from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and Phase 6 (CMIP6) to simulate the sea ice seasonal cycle in Antarctica in terms of area (SIA) and concentration (SIC), as well as the improvements in the most recent models' version, submitted to CMIP6. The results indicated that all models are able to accurately capture the seasonal cycle of the Antarctic SIA, with the minimum (maximum) occurring in February (September). In the Weddell Sea, Amundsen Sea, Bellingshausen Sea, and the Ross Sea, the simulated sea ice concentration revealed a large and systematic bias in February when compared to observations. In September, a large and systematic bias was found nearby the Southern Ocean's northern limit in the Polar Front. Several CMIP6 models exhibited slight improvements on the SIA and SIC estimate over the previous version (CMIP5). All models indicated a significant sea ice loss in the coming years as a response to CO2 forcing. Despite the advancements in the sea ice representation, our findings show that the models are still unable to accurately represent the regional sea ice changes
引用
收藏
页码:1314 / 1332
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation and projection of precipitation in Pakistan using the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model simulations
    Abbas, Adnan
    Ullah, Safi
    Ullah, Waheed
    Waseem, Muhammad
    Dou, Xin
    Zhao, Chengyi
    Karim, Aisha
    Zhu, Jianting
    Hagan, Daniel Fiifi Tawia
    Bhatti, Asher Samuel
    Ali, Gohar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (13) : 6665 - 6684
  • [32] Value addition in coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 over phase 5: global perspectives of precipitation, temperature and soil moisture fields
    Riya Dutta
    Rajib Maity
    Acta Geophysica, 2022, 70 : 1401 - 1415
  • [33] Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 historical simulations in the Colorado River basin
    Gautam, Jenita
    Mascaro, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (10) : 3861 - 3877
  • [34] Comprehensive assessment of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 global climate models using observed temperature and precipitation over mainland Southeast Asia
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Zhaofei
    Yao, Zhijun
    Wang, Rui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (10) : 4139 - 4153
  • [35] Simulation of monsoon intra-seasonal oscillations in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory models from Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project integrations of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5
    Mandke, Sujata K.
    Pillai, Prasanth A.
    Sahai, Atul Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 40 (13) : 5574 - 5589
  • [36] Future evolution of global land surface air temperature trend based on Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 models
    Wu, Wen
    Ji, Fei
    Hu, Shujuan
    He, Yongli
    Wei, Yun
    Xu, Zhenhao
    Yu, Haipeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (15) : 7611 - 7627
  • [37] The GRISLI-LSCE contribution to the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) - Part 1: Projections of the Greenland ice sheet evolution by the end of the 21st century
    Quiquet, Aurelien
    Dumas, Christophe
    CRYOSPHERE, 2021, 15 (02): : 1015 - 1030
  • [38] How certain are El Nino-Southern Oscillation frequency changes in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 models?
    Fix, Fiona
    Buehler, Stefan A.
    Lunkeit, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (02) : 1167 - 1178
  • [39] Simulation of extreme Indian summer monsoon years in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 models: Role of cloud processes
    Chaudhari, Hemantkumar S.
    Hazra, Anupam
    Pokhrel, Samir
    Saha, Subodh Kumar
    Talluri, Sai Sruthi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (02) : 901 - 920
  • [40] Teleconnection Between Atlantic Multidecadal Variability and European Temperature: Diversity and Evaluation of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 Models
    Qasmi, Said
    Cassou, Christophe
    Boe, Julien
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (21) : 11140 - 11149