Quality Assurance for Infrastructure Orchestrators: Emerging Results from Ansible

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
Rahman, Muktadir [2 ]
Wu, Fan [3 ]
Rahman, Akond [4 ]
机构
[1] Tuskegee Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Tuskegee, AL 36088 USA
[2] MetaDesign Solut, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[3] Tuskegee Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Tuskegee, AL USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Auburn, AL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ansible; devops; infrastructure as code;
D O I
10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00073
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Infrastructure as code (IaC) is the practice of automatically managing computing infrastructure at scale. Despite yielding multiple benefits for organizations, the practice of IaC is susceptible to quality concerns, which can lead to large-scale consequences. While researchers have studied quality concerns in IaC manifests, quality aspects of infrastructure orchestrators, i.e., tools that implement the practice of IaC, remain an under-explored area. A systematic investigation of defects in infrastructure orchestrators can help foster further research in the domain of IaC. From our empirical study with 22,445 commits mined from the Ansible infrastructure orchestrator we observe (i) a defect density of 17.9 per KLOC, (ii) 12 categories of Ansible components for which defects appear, and (iii) the 'Module' component to include more defects than the other 11 components. Based on our empirical study, we provide recommendations for researchers to conduct future research to enhance the quality of infrastructure orchestrators.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 324
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] QUALITY ASSURANCE WITH PERSONAL COMPUTERS - EVALUATION OF NUMERICAL RESULTS
    WOIWODE, W
    PHARMAZEUTISCHE INDUSTRIE, 1986, 48 (12): : 1539 - 1543
  • [42] Results of a bulk milk quality assurance programme for paratuberculosis
    Weber, M. F.
    van Schaik, G.
    van Weering, H. J.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2007, 15 : 261 - +
  • [43] RESULTS OF THE EFOMP TRIAL OF A WORKING DOCUMENT ON QUALITY ASSURANCE
    KALLINGER, W
    CLIFTON, J
    HANSEN, H
    MALONE, JF
    GABORIAUD, G
    MACCIA, C
    ANGERSTEIN, W
    ASSMANN, H
    TAUTZ, M
    CALVERD, AM
    FAULKNER, K
    HARRISON, RM
    FLIONIVYZA, A
    LYRA, M
    OKKALIDES, D
    GARAVAGLIA, G
    SCHACHNER, J
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1992, 43 (1-4) : 277 - 278
  • [44] INTERDEPARTMENTAL QUALITY ASSURANCE USING CODED AUTOPSY RESULTS
    MITCHELL, ML
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 1993, 6 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [45] Results of quality assurance in colon surgery - A multicenter study
    Lippert, H
    Gastinger, I
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1997, 122 (01): : 18 - 19
  • [46] Quality Assurance Results for a Commercial Radiosurgery System: A Communication
    Ruschin, Mark
    Lightstone, Alexander
    Beachey, David
    Wronski, Matt
    Babic, Steven
    Yeboah, Collins
    Lee, Young
    Soliman, Hany
    Sahgal, Arjun
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (05) : 601 - 605
  • [47] Quality assurance of milk somatic cell count results
    David, G
    Colloff, A
    Hillerton, E
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2002, 151 (25) : 775 - 775
  • [48] Quality assurance in performance: Evaluating mono benchmark results
    Kalibera, T
    Bulej, L
    Tuma, P
    QUALITY OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES AND SOFTWARE QUALITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3712 : 271 - 288
  • [49] Quality assurance of the Greek UV Network: preliminary results from the pilot phase operation
    Kazantzidis, A.
    Bais, A.
    Topaloglou, C.
    Garane, K.
    Zempila, M.
    Meleti, C.
    Zerefos, C.
    REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUDS AND THE ATMOSPHERE XI, 2006, 6362
  • [50] Results from the radiotherapy quality assurance programme for the FAST-Forward breast trial
    Zotova, R.
    Yarnold, J.
    Wheatley, D.
    Griffin, C.
    Murray, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S209 - S210