Does business environment optimization improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from provincial panel data in China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Peiyu [1 ]
Liu, Xinzhi [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, 27 Shandananlu, Jinan 250100, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Business environment; Carbon emission efficiency; Industrial structure optimization; Green technology progress; Energy rebound effect; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; QUALITY; POLLUTION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32694-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Previous research has yielded mixed conclusions regarding whether business environment (BE) optimization can enhance carbon emission efficiency (CEE). This study delves into the impact of the BE on CEE using panel data from 30 provinces in China, employing fixed effect, quantile, and mediated effect models. It innovates in three key areas: research perspective, mechanism of action, and heterogeneity analysis. The research found that the BE optimization enhances CEE. Meanwhile, the influence of the BE on CEE exhibits marginal decreasing characteristics. The mechanism analysis reveals that the BE enhances CEE through the industrial structure optimization effect and the progress of green technology, while it diminishes efficiency through the energy rebound effect. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that BE optimization has a stronger impact on improving CEE in provinces with robust government governance, younger governors, and highly educated officials. The policy implication suggests that local governments should continually optimize the BE, enhance government governance capacity, and prioritize the appointment of young and highly educated officials.
引用
收藏
页码:24077 / 24098
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact Mechanism and Effect Evaluation of Digital Economy Development on Regional Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China
    Li, Chuang
    Zhao, Qin
    Wang, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (06)
  • [32] Does green technology innovation improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from energy-intensive enterprises in China
    Dong, Hao
    Yan, Zhengying
    Zhang, Jinxin
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [33] Does energy resource misallocation affect energy utilization efficiency? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data
    He, Weijun
    Li, Wanyu
    Wang, Chun
    Wang, Siyuan
    Yang, Yuantao
    ENERGY, 2024, 288
  • [34] Can technological talent agglomeration improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Ping
    Qian, Yu
    Wang, Xuefei
    Yang, Fan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [35] Does corruption matter for the environment? Panel evidence from China
    Liao, Xianchun
    Dogan, Eyup
    Baek, Jungho
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2017, 11
  • [36] Does carbon trading mechanism improve the efficiency of green innovation? Evidence from China
    Bai, Yi-Xiang
    Wang, Chan
    Zeng, Min
    Chen, You-Hua
    Wen, Hong-Xing
    Nie, Pu-Yan
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 49
  • [37] Impact of factor price distortions on energy efficiency: Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China
    Ouyang, Xiaoling
    Wei, Xiaoyun
    Sun, Chuanwang
    Du, Gang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 118 : 573 - 583
  • [38] Estimating the efficiency of primary health care services and its determinants: evidence from provincial panel data in China
    Zhao, Zhe
    Dong, Silai
    Wang, Jiahe
    Jiang, Qingzhi
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [39] Does religious beliefs affect economic growth? Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China
    Wang, Qunyong
    Lin, Xinyu
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 31 : 277 - 287
  • [40] Does Welfare Participation Improve Life Satisfaction? Evidence from Panel Data in Rural China
    Han, Huawei
    Gao, Qin
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2020, 21 (05) : 1795 - 1822