Limited conservation efficacy of large-scale marine protected areas for Pacific skipjack and bigeye tunas

被引:14
|
作者
Hampton, John [1 ]
Lehodey, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Senina, Inna [1 ]
Nicol, Simon [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Scutt Phillips, Joe [1 ]
Tiamere, Kaon [5 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Community, Ocean Fisheries Programme, Noumea, New Caledonia, France
[2] Mercator Ocean Int, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Canberra, Ctr Conservat Biol & Genom, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[5] Minist Fisheries & Marine Resources Dev, Bairiki, Kiribati
关键词
spatial management; tuna fisheries; SEAPODYM; 30; by; MPA; TROPICAL TUNAS; ECOSYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2022.1060943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Large-scale, no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) have been established in several locations in the Pacific and expansion of such areas to reach 30% of the ocean area is actively promoted in some quarters. Justification for the establishment of large oceanic MPAs often includes the conservation benefits that they would bring for tuna stocks, which are the subject of important commercial fisheries in the Pacific. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the conservation efficacy of an existing MPA, the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA) and a series of large hypothetical MPAs each constituting approximately 33% of the western and central Pacific Ocean, for two important and contrasting tuna species, skipjack and bigeye tuna. The evaluation was conducted by comparing control and counterfactual simulations in which the estimated population and fishery dynamics of the species were modelled using a high-resolution modelling framework known as SEAPODYM (Spatial Ecosystem And Population DYnamics Model). We found that stock-wide conservation benefits of the PIPA for these species, assuming that total fishing effort is maintained, to be weak to non-existent, and only modest increases in spawning biomass of both species occur within and in the near vicinity of the PIPA itself. For the larger 33% hypothetical MPAs, changes in stock-wide spawning biomass were estimated to be -0.1% to +5.8% for skipjack tuna and +4.8% to +12.0% for bigeye tuna. Conservation efficacy of MPAs for species such as tropical tunas is limited by their wide larval dispersal and high mobility of later life stages, which spatially dissipate the protective effects of MPAs. Also, the displacement of fishing effort from MPAs to areas remaining open can have negative consequences for stocks and fisheries performance in those areas. We conclude that large oceanic MPAs are not likely to be effective frontline management tools for tropical tunas and other species having similar life history characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conservation paradox: Large-scale mining waste in protected areas in two global hotspots, southeastern Brazil
    Kamino, Luciana Hiromi Yoshino
    Pereira, Eric Oliveira
    do Carmo, Flavio Fonseca
    AMBIO, 2020, 49 (10) : 1629 - 1638
  • [22] Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: Large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas
    Fernandes, L
    Day, J
    Lewis, A
    Slegers, S
    Kerrigan, B
    Breen, D
    Cameron, D
    Jago, B
    Hall, J
    Lowe, D
    Innes, J
    Tanzer, J
    Chadwick, V
    Thompson, L
    Gorman, K
    Simmons, M
    Barnett, B
    Sampson, K
    De'ath, G
    Mapstone, B
    Marsh, H
    Possingham, HP
    Ball, I
    Ward, T
    Dobbs, K
    Aumend, J
    Slater, D
    Stapleton, K
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) : 1733 - 1744
  • [23] Conservation paradox: Large-scale mining waste in protected areas in two global hotspots, southeastern Brazil
    Luciana Hiromi Yoshino Kamino
    Eric Oliveira Pereira
    Flávio Fonseca do Carmo
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 1629 - 1638
  • [24] Environmental market design for large-scale marine conservation
    Villasenor-Derbez, Juan Carlos
    Lynham, John
    Costello, Christopher
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (03) : 234 - +
  • [25] Environmental market design for large-scale marine conservation
    Juan Carlos Villaseñor-Derbez
    John Lynham
    Christopher Costello
    Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 : 234 - 240
  • [26] Why people matter in ocean governance: Incorporating human dimensions into large-scale marine protected areas
    Christie, Patrick
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Gray, Noella J.
    Wilhelm, T. Aulani
    Lewis, Nai'a
    Parks, John
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Gordon, Lindsay
    Day, Jon
    Taei, Sue
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    MARINE POLICY, 2017, 84 : 273 - 284
  • [27] The contribution of very large marine protected areas to marine conservation: Giant leaps or smoke and mirrors?
    Singleton, Rebecca L.
    Roberts, Callum M.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2014, 87 (1-2) : 7 - 10
  • [28] Large-scale climatic variability affects the dynamics of tropical skipjack tuna in the Western Pacific Ocean
    Lima, Mauricio
    Naya, Daniel E.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2011, 34 (04) : 597 - 605
  • [29] Large-scale assessment of benthic communities across multiple marine protected areas using an autonomous underwater vehicle
    Ferrari, Renata
    Marzinelli, Ezequiel M.
    Ayroza, Camila Rezende
    Jordan, Alan
    Figueira, Will F.
    Byrne, Maria
    Malcolm, Hamish A.
    Williams, Stefan B.
    Steinberg, Peter D.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [30] The Former Pelagic Longline Fishery of a Large-Scale Marine Protected Area
    Kerry, Chris
    Metcalfe, Kristian
    Brown, Judith
    Richardson, Andrew J.
    Laptikvoksky, Vladimir
    Reeves, Stuart
    Weber, Nicola
    Weber, Sam B.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2025, 35 (02)