Limited conservation efficacy of large-scale marine protected areas for Pacific skipjack and bigeye tunas

被引:14
|
作者
Hampton, John [1 ]
Lehodey, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Senina, Inna [1 ]
Nicol, Simon [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Scutt Phillips, Joe [1 ]
Tiamere, Kaon [5 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Community, Ocean Fisheries Programme, Noumea, New Caledonia, France
[2] Mercator Ocean Int, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Canberra, Ctr Conservat Biol & Genom, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[5] Minist Fisheries & Marine Resources Dev, Bairiki, Kiribati
关键词
spatial management; tuna fisheries; SEAPODYM; 30; by; MPA; TROPICAL TUNAS; ECOSYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2022.1060943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Large-scale, no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) have been established in several locations in the Pacific and expansion of such areas to reach 30% of the ocean area is actively promoted in some quarters. Justification for the establishment of large oceanic MPAs often includes the conservation benefits that they would bring for tuna stocks, which are the subject of important commercial fisheries in the Pacific. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the conservation efficacy of an existing MPA, the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA) and a series of large hypothetical MPAs each constituting approximately 33% of the western and central Pacific Ocean, for two important and contrasting tuna species, skipjack and bigeye tuna. The evaluation was conducted by comparing control and counterfactual simulations in which the estimated population and fishery dynamics of the species were modelled using a high-resolution modelling framework known as SEAPODYM (Spatial Ecosystem And Population DYnamics Model). We found that stock-wide conservation benefits of the PIPA for these species, assuming that total fishing effort is maintained, to be weak to non-existent, and only modest increases in spawning biomass of both species occur within and in the near vicinity of the PIPA itself. For the larger 33% hypothetical MPAs, changes in stock-wide spawning biomass were estimated to be -0.1% to +5.8% for skipjack tuna and +4.8% to +12.0% for bigeye tuna. Conservation efficacy of MPAs for species such as tropical tunas is limited by their wide larval dispersal and high mobility of later life stages, which spatially dissipate the protective effects of MPAs. Also, the displacement of fishing effort from MPAs to areas remaining open can have negative consequences for stocks and fisheries performance in those areas. We conclude that large oceanic MPAs are not likely to be effective frontline management tools for tropical tunas and other species having similar life history characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics?
    Leenhardt, Pierre
    Cazalet, Bertrand
    Salvat, Bernard
    Claudet, Joachim
    Feral, Francois
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 85 : 112 - 118
  • [2] Going Big in the Pacific Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas in the Pacific Ocean
    Hanich, Quentin
    Schofield, Clive
    Smyth, Chris
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OCEAN LAW AND POLICY, 2020, 5 (01) : 186 - 204
  • [3] Policy interactions in large-scale marine protected areas
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Gray, Noella J.
    Fairbanks, Luke
    Havice, Elizabeth
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    Friedlander, Alan
    Oleson, Kirsten L. L.
    Sam, King
    Mitchell, Lillian
    Hanich, Quentin
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2021, 14 (01):
  • [4] Addressing Criticisms of Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas
    O'Leary, Bethan C.
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Fernandez, Miriam
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    Garcia-Borboroglu, Pablo
    Golbuu, Yimnang
    Guidetti, Paolo
    Harris, Jean M.
    Hawkins, Julie P.
    Langlois, Tim
    Mccauley, Douglas J.
    Pikitch, Ellen K.
    Richmond, Robert H.
    Roberts, Callum M.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (05) : 359 - 370
  • [5] Stakeholder perspectives on large-scale marine protected areas
    Artis, Evan
    Gray, Noella J.
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Acton, Leslie
    Zigler, Sarah Bess
    Mitchell, Lillian
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [6] Media bias on communicating conservation interventions: The case of large-scale marine protected areas in the South Atlantic
    Patrizzi, Nayla S.
    Barros, Francisco
    Giglio, Vinicius J.
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 149
  • [7] Large-scale marine protected areas and imaginaries of progress in ocean governance
    Montana, Jasper
    Hartman Davies, Oscar
    GEO-GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 11 (02):
  • [8] Brazilian large-scale marine protected areas: Other "paper parks"?
    da Silva, Alexandre Pereira
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 169 : 104 - 112
  • [9] Characterising essential breeding habitat for whales informs the development of large-scale Marine Protected Areas in the South Pacific
    Lindsay, Rebecca E.
    Constantine, Rochelle
    Robbins, Jooke
    Mattila, David K.
    Tagarino, Alden
    Dennis, Todd E.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2016, 548 : 263 - 275
  • [10] Human Dimensions of Large-scale Marine Protected Areas: Advancing Research and Practice
    Gray, Noella J.
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Day, Jon C.
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Wilhelm, T. Aulani
    Christie, Patrick
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 45 (06) : 407 - 415