The importance of graph databases and graph learning for clinical applications

被引:4
|
作者
Walke, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Micheel, Daniel [2 ]
Schallert, Kay [3 ]
Muth, Thilo [4 ]
Broneske, David [5 ]
Saake, Gunter [2 ]
Heyer, Robert [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Bioproc Engn, Univ Pl 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Otto von Guericke Univ, Database & Software Engn Grp, Univ Pl 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Leibniz Inst Analyt Wissensch ISAS eV, Multidimens Omics Anal Grp, Bunsen Kirchhoff Str 11, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
[4] BAM Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing, Sct eSci S 3, Unter Eichen 87, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
[5] German Ctr Higher Educ Res & Sci Studies DZHW, Infrastruct & Methods, Lange Laube 12, D-30159 Hannover, Germany
[6] Bielefeld Univ, Fac Technol, Univ Str 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
LINK PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1093/database/baad045
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The increasing amount and complexity of clinical data require an appropriate way of storing and analyzing those data. Traditional approaches use a tabular structure (relational databases) for storing data and thereby complicate storing and retrieving interlinked data from the clinical domain. Graph databases provide a great solution for this by storing data in a graph as nodes (vertices) that are connected by edges (links). The underlying graph structure can be used for the subsequent data analysis (graph learning). Graph learning consists of two parts: graph representation learning and graph analytics. Graph representation learning aims to reduce high-dimensional input graphs to low-dimensional representations. Then, graph analytics uses the obtained representations for analytical tasks like visualization, classification, link prediction and clustering which can be used to solve domain-specific problems. In this survey, we review current state-of-the-art graph database management systems, graph learning algorithms and a variety of graph applications in the clinical domain. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive use case for a clearer understanding of complex graph learning algorithms. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning Probabilistic Relational Models with (partially structured) Graph Databases
    El Abri, Marwa
    Leray, Philippe
    Essoussi, Nadia
    2017 IEEE/ACS 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2017, : 256 - 263
  • [22] Mapping RDF Databases to Property Graph Databases
    Angles, Renzo
    Thakkar, Harsh
    Tomaszuk, Dominik
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 86091 - 86110
  • [23] A Graph Model for Taxi Ride Sharing Supported by Graph Databases
    Steinmetz, Dietrich
    Merz, Felix
    Ma, Hui
    Hartmann, Sven
    CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2019, 2019, 11788 : 108 - 116
  • [24] Efficient Graph Similarity Search Over Large Graph Databases
    Zheng, Weiguo
    Zou, Lei
    Lian, Xiang
    Wang, Dong
    Zhao, Dongyan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2015, 27 (04) : 964 - 978
  • [25] Querying Graph Databases: What Do Graph Patterns Mean?
    Mennicke, Stephan
    Kalo, Jan-Christoph
    Balke, Wolf-Tilo
    CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2017, 2017, 10650 : 134 - 148
  • [26] Query Languages for Graph Databases
    Wood, Peter T.
    SIGMOD RECORD, 2012, 41 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [27] Graph Databases: Their Power and Limitations
    Pokorny, Jaroslav
    COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9339 : 58 - 69
  • [28] SEMANTIC ACYCLICITY ON GRAPH DATABASES
    Barcelo, Pablo
    Romero, Miguel
    Vardi, Moshe Y.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2016, 45 (04) : 1339 - 1376
  • [29] Querying Graph Databases at Scale
    Hogan, Aidan
    Vrgoc, Domagoj
    COMPANION OF THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA, SIGMOD-COMPANION 2024, 2024, : 585 - 589
  • [30] From Databases to Graph Visualization
    Gilbert, Frederic
    Auber, David
    2010 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION VISUALISATION (IV 2010), 2010, : 128 - 133