Revisiting live attenuated influenza vaccine efficacy among children in developing countries

被引:1
|
作者
Bagga, Sumedha [1 ]
Krishnan, Anand [2 ]
Dar, Lalit [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Microbiol, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Ctr Community Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Live attenuated influenza vaccine; Developing countries; Pediatric; LAIV efficacy; LAIV effectiveness; T-CELL RESPONSES; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; UNITED-STATES; IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; YOUNG-CHILDREN; RELATIVE EFFICACY; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; PREVENTION; TRIVALENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.058
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Seasonal influenza epidemics cause significant pediatric mortality and morbidity worldwide. Live atten-uated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) can be administered intranasally, induce a broad and robust immune response, demonstrate higher yields during manufacturing as compared to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs), and thereby represent an attractive possibility for young children in developing countries. We summarize recent pediatric studies evaluating LAIV efficacy in developing countries where a large pro-portion of the influenza-virus-associated respiratory disease burden occurs. Recently, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in children reported contradictory results; vaccine efficacy varied between Bangladesh (41 %) and Senegal (0.0 %) against all influenza viral strains. Prior to 2013, Ann Arbor-based LAIV demonstrated superior efficacy as compared to IIV. However, due to low effectiveness of the Ann Arbor-based LAIV against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-like viruses, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended against the use of LAIV during the 2016-17 and 2017-18 influenza seasons. Reduced replicative fitness of the A(H1N1)pdm09 LAIV strains is thought to have led to the low effectiveness of the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV. Once the A(H1N1) pdm09 component was updated, the ACIP reintroduced the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV as a vaccine choice for the 2018-19 influenza season. In 2021, results from a 2-year RCT evaluating the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in rural north India reported that LAIV demonstrated significantly lower efficacy compared to IIV, but in Year 2, the vaccine efficacy for LAIV and IIV was comparable. A profounder understanding of the mechanisms underlying varied efficacy of LAIV in developing countries is warranted. Assessing replicative fitness, in addition to antigenicity, when selecting annual A(H1N1)pdm09 components in the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIVs is essential and may ultimately, enable widespread utility in resource-poor settings.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Superior relative efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine compared with inactivated influenza vaccine in young children with recurrent respiratory tract infections
    Ashkenazi, Shai
    Vertruyen, Andre
    Aristegui, Javier
    Esposito, Susanna
    McKeith, David Douglas
    Klemola, Timo
    Biolek, Jiri
    Kuehr, Joachim
    Bujnowski, Tadeusz
    Desgrandchamps, Daniel
    Cheng, Sheau-Mei
    Skinner, Jonathan
    Gruber, William C.
    Forrest, Bruce D.
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (10) : 870 - 879
  • [32] Efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine in children: A meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials
    Rhorer, Janelle
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Dickinson, Stephanie
    Hamilton, Holli
    Oleka, Napoleon A.
    Malinoski, FrankJ.
    Wittes, Janet
    VACCINE, 2009, 27 (07) : 1101 - 1110
  • [33] EFFICACY OF LIVE ATTENUATED INFLUENZA VACCINE (LAIV) BY AGE IN CHILDREN 6 MONTHS TO 17 YEARS OF AGE
    Belshe, R.
    Toback, S.
    Moren, S.
    Ambrose, C.
    Yi, T.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2009, 98 : 86 - 86
  • [34] Efficacy in children of live attenuated influenza vaccine: a meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials
    Rhorer, J.
    Dickinson, S.
    Oleka, N.
    Cho, I.
    Ambrose, C.
    Wittes, J.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 : 87 - 87
  • [35] Do parents prefer inactivated or live attenuated influenza vaccine for their children?
    Santibanez, Tammy A.
    Kahn, Katherine E.
    Bridges, Carolyn B.
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (48) : 7300 - 7305
  • [36] Live attenuated influenza vaccine use and safety in children and adults with asthma
    Duffy, Jonathan
    Lewis, Melissa
    Harrington, Theresa
    Baxter, Roger
    Belongia, Edward A.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    Jacobsen, Steven J.
    Lee, Grace M.
    Naleway, Allison L.
    Nordin, James
    Daley, Matthew F.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 118 (04) : 439 - 444
  • [37] LIVE ATTENUATED VARICELLA VACCINE - EFFICACY FOR CHILDREN WITH LEUKEMIA IN REMISSION
    GERSHON, AA
    STEINBERG, SP
    GELB, L
    GALASSO, G
    BORKOWSKY, W
    LARUSSA, P
    FERRARA, A
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 252 (03): : 355 - 362
  • [38] Use of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Children With Egg Allergy and Asthma
    Kelso, John M.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2015, 4 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [39] The role of nasal IgA in children vaccinated with live attenuated influenza vaccine
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Wu, Xionghua
    Jones, Taff
    Mallory, Raburn M.
    VACCINE, 2012, 30 (48) : 6794 - 6801
  • [40] LIVE ATTENUATED AND INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE IN SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN
    GRUBER, WC
    TABER, LH
    GLEZEN, WP
    CLOVER, RD
    ABELL, TD
    DEMMLER, RW
    COUCH, RB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1990, 144 (05): : 595 - 600