Model-based process optimization for mAb chromatography

被引:7
|
作者
Kozorog, Mirijam [1 ]
Caserman, Simon [1 ,3 ]
Grom, Matic [2 ]
Vicente, Filipa A. [2 ,3 ]
Pohar, Andrej [2 ]
Likozar, Blaz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Chem, Dept Mol Biol & Nanobiotechnol, Hajdrihova 19, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Natl Inst Chem, Dept Catalysis & Chem React Engn, Hajdrihova 19, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Natl Inst Chem, Hajdrihova 19, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Protein A antibody affinity chromatography; General rate mathematical model; Affinity resin properties; Process intensification and optimization; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY PURIFICATION; TWIN-COLUMN CAPTURESMB; AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY; DESIGN; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; BINDING; RESIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122528
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Protein A affinity chromatography is an effective method for capturing and purification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are amongst the most important products in the biopharmaceutical industry. Being one of the most expensive steps of downstream purification, optimization of Protein A affinity chromatography towards higher productivity offers great potential for the reduction of production cost. Hence, this work presents the productivity optimization through four strategies of crude harvest loading in Protein A affinity chromatography. Loading strategies were optimized using a mathematical model and were compared on basis of their maximal productivities. It is theoretically shown, based on computational analysis, that the performance of existing classical batch processes can be optimized by implementing an improved loading step and fine tuning of process parameters without any additional investment in new or modified equipment, materials or energy. This approach offers an attractive alternative to existing capture steps and helps bridging a technological gap to new semi continuous processes that are still lacking sufficient reliability due to technical complexity. Increased produc-tivity leads to lower amount of affinity resin demanded to process a given amount of crude harvest or to reduce the processing time. With a new loading strategy, less expensive affinity resins may also become an effective alternative. Amongst four different loading strategies, the loading using flow ramp was predicted by model as the most promising one and the mAb binding dynamic at changing loading velocity was tested experimentally on five different affinity resins to validate model predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NONLINEAR PROCESS MODEL-BASED CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION OF A MODEL-IV FCC UNIT
    KHANDALEKAR, PD
    RIGGS, JB
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 19 (11) : 1153 - 1168
  • [42] Model-based integrated optimization and evaluation of a multi-step ion exchange chromatography
    Huuk, Thiemo C.
    Hahn, Tobias
    Osberghaus, Anna
    Hubbuch, Juergen
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 136 : 207 - 222
  • [43] Multi-objective optimization superimposed model-based process design of an enzymatic hydrolysis process
    Zitzewitz, Philip
    Fieg, Georg
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2017, 63 (06) : 1974 - 1988
  • [44] Model Inversion Networks for Model-Based Optimization
    Kumar, Aviral
    Levine, Sergey
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 33, NEURIPS 2020, 2020, 33
  • [45] Model-Based Process Optimization Supports the Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Relevant Nucleoside Derivatives
    Cruz Bournazoua M.N.
    Gruber M.
    Kamel S.
    Giessman R.
    Wagner A.
    Neubauer P.
    Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik, 2016, 88 (09): : 1245
  • [46] Optimization of preselection process in model-based selection for proton in head and neck cancer
    Tambas, M.
    Van den Hoek, J. G. M.
    Kierkels, R. G. J.
    Scandurra, D.
    Wolters, A.
    Mulder, D.
    Oldehinkel, E.
    Meijer, T. W. H.
    Both, S.
    Steenbakkers, R. J. H. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S233 - S234
  • [47] Model-based Optimization with Concept Drifts
    Richter, Jakob
    Shi, Junjie
    Chen, Jian-Jia
    Rahnenfuehrer, Joerg
    Lang, Michel
    GECCO'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2020, : 877 - 885
  • [48] On the optimization problem of model-based monitoring
    L. Ginzinger
    M. N. Sahinkaya
    B. Heckmann
    P. Keogh
    H. Ulbrich
    Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54 : 1095 - 1106
  • [49] Sequential Model-Based Ensemble Optimization
    Lacoste, Alexandre
    Larochelle, Hugo
    Marchand, Mario
    Laviolette, Francois
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, : 440 - 448
  • [50] Model-based optimization of ultrasonic transducers
    Heikkola, E
    Laitinen, M
    ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 12 (1-2) : 53 - 57