Demand-side climate change mitigation: where do we stand and where do we go?

被引:9
|
作者
Creutzig, Felix [1 ,2 ]
Roy, Joyashree [3 ]
Minx, Jan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Sustainabil Econ Human Settlements, Berlin, Germany
[3] Asian Inst Technol, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Univ Leeds, Priestley Ctr Climate Futures, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, England
关键词
Compendex;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is now well established that the demand side can contribute substantially to climate change mitigation thus increasing the solution space. The recent IPCC synthesis report for the first time explicitly reflected this class of solutions. Here, we provide an overview of an unique set of 22 review papers published in the focus issue of Environmental Research Letters. We also extract a key set of insights, ranging from the varied but rapidly evolving literature to demand-side mitigation potential, relevance for well-being, and consistent categorization of options across end-use sectors. We find that demand-side approaches to climate change mitigation supplement exclusively technology-focused supply side solutions and, in many cases, comprise system-wide effect contributing to well-being and planetary stability. Review studies cover macro-economics, well-being, and sustainable development goals on the metric side, and investigate consumption-based individual options, urban strategies, transport, building, and food sector potentials, but also the role of the circular economy, material efficiency, and digitalization. Demand-side measures can be categorized into avoid, shift, and improve approaches. Several additional reviews systematically investigate psychological and social approaches and initiatives to foster climate change mitigation. We finally outline important gaps and questions to be tackled in the coming years.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LAPAROSCOPIC INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?
    Rosati, Andrea
    Guidi, Giacomo
    De Palma, Antonella
    Zampolini, Alice
    Boccia, Serena
    Conte, Carmine
    Costantini, Barbara
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fagotti, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A51 - A51
  • [42] Digital Radiation Oncology (4.0?) - where do we stand, where do we want to go?
    Heinemann, F.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 : S113 - S113
  • [43] Epidemiology of measles in Bavaria. Where do we stand, where do we want to go
    Schoenberger, K.
    Sing, A.
    Wildner, M.
    Liebl, B.
    Hautmann, W.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2015, 77
  • [44] Special Issue: Fuzzy Set Theory Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go?
    Bodenhofer, Ulrich
    De Baets, Bernard
    Klement, Erich Peter
    Saminger-Platz, Susanne
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 192 : 1 - 2
  • [45] NMR-based plant metabolomics: where do we stand, where do we go?
    Kim, Hye Kyong
    Choi, Young Hae
    Verpoorte, Robert
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 29 (06) : 267 - 275
  • [46] URINARY-INCONTINENCE - WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE
    RESNICK, NM
    OUSLANDER, JG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1990, 38 (03) : 263 - 264
  • [47] Ophiuroid (Echinodermata) systematics-where do we come from, where do we stand and where should we go?
    Stohr, Sabine
    ECHINODERM RESEARCH 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ECHINODERMS, 2012, 7 : 147 - 161
  • [48] Tackling the problems of polypharmacy - Where do we stand and where should we go?
    Onder, G.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2015, 48 : 4 - 4
  • [49] Sjogren's syndrome: Where do we stand, and where shall we go?
    Cornec, Divi
    Jamin, Christophe
    Pers, Jacques-Olivier
    JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 2014, 51 : 109 - 114
  • [50] Olive oil phenolics: Where do we stand? Where should we go?
    Visioli, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2012, 92 (10) : 2017 - 2019