Ready-to-eat cereal is an affordable breakfast option associated with better nutrient intake and diet quality in the US population

被引:4
|
作者
Zhu, Yong [1 ]
Jain, Neha [2 ]
Normington, James [3 ]
Holschuh, Norton [3 ]
Sanders, Lisa M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Gen Mills, Bell Inst Hlth & Nutr, Golden Valley, MN 55426 USA
[2] Gen Mills, Stat & Data Sci, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[3] Gen Mills, Stat & Data Sci, Golden Valley, MN USA
[4] Cornerstone Nutr LLC, Battle Creek, MI USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
ready-to-eat cereal; breakfast; meal cost; dietary intake; nutrition affordability; NATIONAL-HEALTH; CHILDREN; CONSUMPTION; NUTRITION; ADOLESCENTS; COGNITION; ADULTS; INDEX;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2022.1088080
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundResults from observational studies have reported ready-to-eat cereal (RTEC) consumers have higher dietary quality and nutrient intake compared to consumers of non-RTEC breakfasts or those who do not eat breakfast. Yet, there have been few investigations on the relationship of RTEC to meal costs at breakfast and across the day, which may be one reason some consumers choose to not consume breakfast. ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the contribution of RTEC consumed at breakfast to nutrient intake and adequacy, diet quality and meal costs in a nationally representative sample of children and adults in the US. MethodsDietary data from 2,259 children (2-18 years) and 4,776 adults (>= 19 years) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 were evaluated to compare nutrient intake, adequacy, dietary quality, and food costs in RTEC breakfast consumers, non-RTEC breakfast consumers and those who did not consume breakfast. ResultsRTEC breakfast consumers made up 28% of children and 12% of adults. Children and adults consuming RTEC for breakfast had higher intakes of carbohydrate, dietary fiber, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, phosphorus, potassium, B vitamins, vitamins A and D, whole grains, and total dairy compared to consumers of non-RTEC breakfast or no breakfast. There were no differences by breakfast status for sodium, saturated fat, or added sugar, except adults consuming RTEC had lower added sugar intake compared to those who did not consume breakfast. RTEC breakfast consumers were also more likely to meet estimated average requirements (EAR) for intake of several nutrients and had overall higher dietary quality. For children, breakfast meal costs were less for RTEC breakfast compared to non-RTEC breakfast, but total daily meal costs were similar for consumers of RTEC and non-RTEC breakfasts. ConclusionRTEC breakfasts may contribute to greater nutrient intake and diet quality in children and adults in the US without increasing total daily meal costs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条