Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:4
|
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Matanes, Emad [1 ]
Brezinov, Yoav [2 ]
Ferenczy, Alex [3 ]
Pelmus, Manuela [3 ]
Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi [1 ]
Salvador, Shannon [1 ]
Lau, Susie [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Segal Canc Ctr, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2024年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Endometrial cancer; Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; Machine learning; Prediction models; WOMEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. Results: Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. Conclusions: Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Secretory Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Jeffus, Susanne K.
    Winham, Whitney
    Hooper, Kari
    Quick, Charles M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 33 (05) : 515 - 516
  • [22] PTEN, E-cadherin and β-catenin Expression in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endometrial Carcinoma
    Sharma, Gaurav
    Makker, Annu
    Nigam, Dipti
    Singh, Uma
    Das, Vinita
    Goel, Sudhir Kumar
    Goel, Madhu Mati
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 46 : S82 - S82
  • [23] Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia
    Mutter, George L.
    Zaino, Richard J.
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    Bentley, Rex C.
    Robboy, Stanley J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (02) : 103 - 114
  • [24] Time to treatment by neighborhood among endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and endometrial cancer patients
    Wang, Victoria
    Reid, Hadley
    Pelletier, Andrea
    Russell, Trinity
    Chen, Lucy
    Marsh, Reagan
    Feltmate, Colleen
    Wright, Alexi
    Elias, Kevin
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12)
  • [25] Is lymph node assessment warranted in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia on an endometrial biopsy?
    Matanes, Emad
    Amajoud, Zainab
    Mitric, Cristina
    Yasmeen, Amber
    Ismail, Sara
    Raban, Oded
    Kogan, Liron
    Knigin, David
    Lau, Susie
    Salvador, Shannon
    Gotlieb, Walter
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S167 - S168
  • [26] Outcomes of the conservative management of the patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/endometrial cancer: Wait or treat!
    Isci Bostanci, Esra
    DurmuS, Yasin
    Duru Coteli, A. Sinem
    Kayikcioglu, Fulya
    Boran, Nurettin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (04) : 2066 - 2072
  • [27] Current management of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN)
    Gultekin, M.
    Diribas, K.
    Dursun, P.
    Ayhan, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (04) : 396 - 401
  • [28] Outcomes of the conservative management of the patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/endometrial cancer: Wait or treat!
    Bostanci, Esra Isci
    Durmus, Yasin
    Coteli, A. Sinem Duru
    Kayikcioglu, Fulya
    Boran, Nurettin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 52 (03) : 871 - +
  • [29] The Sonographic Appearance of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Levine, Deborah
    Gupta, Sonia C.
    Kwan, Charlene
    Brook, Alexander
    Jorgensen, Elisa M.
    Kappler, Amanda
    Hecht, Jonathan L.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (07) : 1723 - 1737
  • [30] Preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of concurrent endometrial cancer: Does tissue sampling technique matter?
    Zimmerman, Jenna
    Natan, Sidney
    Morrison, Jane
    Zakhour, Mae
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S111 - S112