Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:4
|
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Matanes, Emad [1 ]
Brezinov, Yoav [2 ]
Ferenczy, Alex [3 ]
Pelmus, Manuela [3 ]
Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi [1 ]
Salvador, Shannon [1 ]
Lau, Susie [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Segal Canc Ctr, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2024年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Endometrial cancer; Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; Machine learning; Prediction models; WOMEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. Results: Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. Conclusions: Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia
    Levin, Gabriel
    Matanes, Emad
    Brezinov, Yoav
    Brodeur, Melica
    Salvador, Shannon
    Lau, Susie
    Gotlieb, Walter
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S267 - S267
  • [2] Immunohistochemical prediction for concurrent endometrial carcinoma on biopsy samples with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia
    Georgescu, T. A.
    Dumitru, A.
    Lazaroiu, A. M.
    Cirstoiu, M.
    Costache, M.
    Sajin, M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S79 - S80
  • [3] Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis
    Hecht, JL
    Ince, TA
    Baak, JPA
    Baker, HE
    Ogden, MW
    Mutter, GL
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 (03) : 324 - 330
  • [4] Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed at endometrial resection
    Perez-Medina, T
    Bajo-Arenas, J
    Sanfrutos, L
    Haya, J
    Iniesta, S
    Vargas, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2003, 10 (04): : 542 - 544
  • [5] Incidence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia versus atypical endometrial polyp
    Cohen, Aviad
    Tsur, Yossi
    Tako, Einat
    Levin, Ishai
    Gil, Yaron
    Michaan, Nadav
    Grisaru, Dan
    Laskov, Ido
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [6] Missing concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: Which is better, directed biopsy versus blinded?
    Butler, Kristina
    Afsar, Selim
    Rassier, Sarah
    Brien, Amy
    Casper, Katie
    Carrubba, Aakriti
    Mitchell, Mariah
    Griffith, Megan
    Khalife, Tarek
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S387 - S387
  • [8] Time interval from biopsy of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia to surgery and risk for concurrent endometrial carcinoma
    Levin, Gabriel
    Matanes, Emad
    Brodeur, Melica
    Salvador, Shannon
    Lau, Susie
    Gotlieb, Walter
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S359 - S359
  • [9] Preoperative predictors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of HALP score and other inflammatory markers
    Aytekin, Okan
    Karagoz, Cigdem
    Goktas, Esra
    Tokalioglu, Abdurrahman Alp
    Guner, Gulsah Tiryaki
    Ucar, Yesim Ozkaya
    Kilic, Fatih
    Turan, Taner
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 26 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [10] Prevalence of occult endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent hysterectomy
    Thongsang, Waraphon
    Kuljarusnont, Sompop
    Hanamornroongruang, Suchanan
    Ruengkhachorn, Irene
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)