Detection and quantification of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina using different target genes

被引:0
|
作者
Giglioti, Rodrigo [1 ]
Vercesi Filho, Anibal Eugenio [1 ]
Domingos, Ana Goncalves [2 ]
da Silva, Sergio Silva [3 ]
Cunha, Rodrigo Casquero [4 ]
Ibelli, Adriana M. ercia Guaratini [5 ]
Okino, Cintia Hiromi [5 ]
Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de Sena [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Zootecnia, Rua Heitor Penteado 56, BR-13380011 Nova Odessa, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Inst Higiene & Med Trop, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] CRO Anim Sci, Estr Colonia Sao Domingos, Turucu, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas, Fac Vet, Lab Biol Mol Vet, Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
[5] Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Babesiosis; Detection; Quantification; qPCR; sensitivity; SAO-PAULO STATE; BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS; INFECTION; CATTLE; PCR; AMPLIFICATION; RESISTANCE; DIVERSITY; VACCINES; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.105122
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Molecular assays have been widely used for the detection and quantification of bovine babesiosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity. However, variations in the sensitivity of pathogen detection may occur depending on the selected target gene. Thus, this study aimed to compare the detection sensitivity (DS) of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina infection levels in artificially and naturally infected cattle using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and six target genes. For B. bovis, the merozoite surface antigen genes 2b and 2c (msa-2b and msa-2c), and the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cybmt) were used. For B. bigemina, the genes encoding the proteins associated with rhoptry 1c (rap-1c), rap-1a, and cybmt were used. Six bovines, free of babesiosis, were artificially infected with 1 x 10-8 red blood cells infected (iRBC) with B. bovis (n = 3) or 1 x 10-6 B. bigemina iRBC (n = 3). The animals were evaluated daily until parasitemia was confirmed (>= 2.0%). The quantity of iRBC present in each animal was determined by examining blood smears. Blood samples were then subjected to DNA extraction, serial dilution, and qPCR analysis to determine the DS of each target gene. In addition, 30 calves naturally infected by Babesia spp. were also evaluated using the same six target genes. Regarding the artificial infection, B. bovis cybmt showed 25-fold higher sensitivity than the msa-2b and msa-2c genes, while the B. bigemina cybmt exhibited 5-fold and 25-fold higher sensitivity than the rap-1a and rap-1c genes, respectively. The rap-1a gene was found to be 5 times more sensitive than the rap-1c gene, while the B. bovis msa-2b and msa-2c genes exhibited similar DS. The positive frequencies of naturally infected calves for the target cybmt, msa-2b, and msa-2c genes (B. bovis) were: 100%, 33.3% and 50%, while cybmt, rap-1a, and rap-1c genes (B. bigemina) were 90%, 83.3%, and 63.3%, respectively. This study may contribute to the selection of suitable genes for molecular monitoring of bovine babesiosis. Mitochondrial genes could be considered as an alternative to improve the sensitivity of B. bovis and B. bigemina detection using qPCR.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Field challenge of cattle vaccinated with a combined Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina frozen immunogen
    Alvarez, JA
    Ramos, JA
    Rojas, EE
    Mosqueda, JJ
    Vega, CA
    Olvera, AM
    Figueroa, JV
    Cantó, GJ
    IMPACT OF ECOLOGICAL CHANGES ON TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND DISEASE CONTROL, 2004, 1026 : 277 - 283
  • [32] Immunochemical characterization of in vitro culture-derived antigens of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina
    Passos, LMF
    Bell-Sakyi, L
    Brown, CGD
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1998, 76 (04) : 239 - 249
  • [33] PREVALENCE OF ANAPLASMA-MARGINALE, BABESIA BIGEMINA AND BABESIA-BOVIS IN NIGERIAN CATTLE USING SEROLOGICAL METHODS
    AJAYI, SA
    DIPEOLU, OO
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1986, 22 (1-2) : 147 - 149
  • [34] SEROLOGICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A LARGE BABESIA FOUND IN JAPANESE CATTLE AND BABESIA-MAJOR, BABESIA-BIGEMINA AND BABESIA-BOVIS
    FUJINAGA, T
    MINAMI, T
    ISHIHARA, T
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1980, 29 (02) : 230 - 234
  • [35] Investigation of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in cattle by Real Time PCR and molecular characterization of the isolates
    Duzlu, Onder
    Yildirim, Alparslan
    Inci, Abdullah
    Avcioglu, Hamza
    Balkaya, Ibrahim
    ANKARA UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2015, 62 (01): : 27 - 35
  • [36] DEVELOPMENT OF AN INVITRO MICROTEST TO ASSESS DRUG SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BABESIA-BOVIS AND BABESIA-BIGEMINA
    BROCKELMAN, CR
    TANARIYA, P
    JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 1991, 77 (06) : 994 - 997
  • [37] Development of TaqMan-based real-time PCR assays for diagnostic detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina
    Kim, Chulmin
    Iseki, Hiroshi
    Herbas, Maria Shirley
    Yokoyama, Naoaki
    Suzuki, Hiroshi
    Xuan, Xuenan
    Fujisaki, Kozo
    Igarashi, Kuo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2007, 77 (05): : 837 - 841
  • [38] International interlaboratory validation of a nested PCR for molecular detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina, causative agents of bovine babesiosis
    Ganzinelli, Sabrina
    Byaruhanga, Charles
    Primo, Maria E.
    Lukanji, Zinathi
    Sibeko, Kgomotso
    Matjila, Tshepo
    Neves, Luis
    Benitez, Daniel
    Enkhbaatar, Batmagnai
    Nugraha, Arifin Budiman
    Igarashi, Ikuo
    Florin-Christensen, Monica
    Schnittger, Leonhard
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2022, 304
  • [39] Genetic characterization and molecular survey of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina and Babesia ovata in cattle, dairy cattle and yaks in China
    Niu, Qingli
    Liu, Zhijie
    Yu, Peifa
    Yang, Jifei
    Abdallah, Mirza Omar
    Guan, Guiquan
    Liu, Guangyuan
    Luo, Jianxun
    Yin, Hong
    PARASITES & VECTORS, 2015, 8
  • [40] Comparison of different direct diagnostic methods to identify Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in animals vaccinated with live attenuated parasites
    Costa-Junior, Livio Martins
    Leite Rabelo, Elida Mara
    Martins-Filho, Olindo Assis
    Barbosa Ribeiro, Mucio Flavio
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2006, 139 (1-3) : 231 - 236