Prediction Models for Dysphagia in Intensive Care Unit after Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Juan [1 ]
Lu, Guangyu [2 ]
Wang, Zhiyao [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jingyue [1 ]
Ding, Jiali [1 ]
Zeng, Qingping [1 ]
Chai, Liying [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Li [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Hailong [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Yuping [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Sch Nursing & Publ Hlth, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Yangzhou Univ, Med Coll, Inst Publ Hlth, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Clin Med Coll, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Yangzhou Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Neuro Intens Care Unit, Clin Med Coll, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurol, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Yangzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll, Dept Neurosurg, Neurointens Care Unit, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2024年 / 134卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dysphagia; intensive care; invasive mechanical ventilation; prediction models; systematic review; OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA; RISK; APPLICABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; PROBAST; IMPACT; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/lary.30931
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
ObjectiveDysphagia is a common condition that can independently lead to death in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly those who require mechanical ventilation. Despite extensive research on the predictors of dysphagia development, consistency across these studies is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors and summarize existing prediction models for dysphagia in ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. MethodsWe searched five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Studies that developed a post-extubation dysphagia risk prediction model in ICU were included. A meta-analysis of individual predictor variables was performed with mixed-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). ResultsAfter screening 1,923 references, we ultimately included nine studies in our analysis. The most commonly identified risk predictors included in the final risk prediction model were the length of indwelling endotracheal tube & GE;72 h, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score & GE;15, age & GE;65 years, and duration of gastric tube & GE;72 h. However, PROBAST analysis revealed a high risk of bias in the performance of these prediction models, mainly because of the lack of external validation, inadequate pre-screening of variables, and improper treatment of continuous and categorical predictors. ConclusionsThese models are particularly susceptible to bias because of numerous limitations in their development and inadequate external validation. Future research should focus on externally validating the existing model in ICU patients with varying characteristics. Moreover, assessing the acceptance and effectiveness of the model in clinical practice is needed. Level of EvidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 2023
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 525
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The risk assessment tool for intensive care unit readmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Long, Jianying
    Wang, Min
    Li, Wenrui
    Cheng, Jie
    Yuan, Mengyuan
    Zhong, Mingming
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Zhang, Caiyun
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 76
  • [22] Safety of Patient Mobilization and Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Nydahl, Peter
    Sricharoenchai, Thiti
    Chandra, Saurabh
    Kundt, Firuzan Sari
    Huang, Minxuan
    Fischill, Magdalena
    Needham, Dale M.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 (05) : 766 - 777
  • [23] Pneumonia Prevention to Decrease Mortality in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Roquilly, Antoine
    Marret, Emmanuel
    Abraham, Edward
    Asehnoune, Karim
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 60 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [24] Hypomagnesemia and mortality in patients admitted to intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Upala, Sikarin
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Wijarnpreecha, Karn
    Sanguankeo, Anawin
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 109 (07) : 453 - 459
  • [25] Apnoeic oxygenation during intubation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Binks, Matthew J.
    Holyoak, Rhys S.
    Melhuish, Thomas M.
    Vlok, Ruan
    Hodge, Anthony
    Ryan, Thomas
    White, Leigh D.
    HEART & LUNG, 2017, 46 (06): : 452 - 457
  • [26] LUNG CANCER PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Dave, Prashil
    Shastri, Dipsa
    Singla, Ankur
    Opeyemi, Yakubu Aliu
    Irfan, Sohaib
    Uddin, Anwar
    Pramanik, Debolina
    Khanam, Mousumi
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [27] A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for intensive care unit acquired weakness
    Yang, Zi
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Wang, Faying
    Peng, Zeyu
    Fan, Yuying
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (43)
  • [28] Time of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Williams, Vijai
    Jaiswal, Nishant
    Chauhan, Anil
    Pradhan, Pranita
    Jayashree, Muralidharan
    Singh, Meenu
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for operating room to intensive care unit handoffs
    Abraham, Joanna
    Meng, Alicia
    Tripathy, Sanjna
    Avidan, Michael S.
    Kannampallil, Thomas
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (06) : 513 - 524
  • [30] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of delirium in intensive care unit inpatients after cognitive exercise intervention
    Xu, Chaohong
    Chen, Zhenzhen
    Zhang, Luxia
    Guo, Han
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (02) : 663 - 672