Evaluating the impacts of alternative grazing management practices on soil carbon sequestration and soil health indicators

被引:10
|
作者
Kim, JungJin [1 ,2 ]
Ale, Srinivasulu [1 ,5 ]
Kreuter, Urs P. [3 ]
Teague, W. Richard [1 ]
DelGrosso, Stephen J. [4 ]
Dowhower, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, POB 1658, Vernon, TX 76385 USA
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Environm Technol, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecol & Conservat Biol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] ARS, USDA, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[5] 11708 Highway 70 South, Vernon, TX 76385 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Adaptive Multi-paddock grazing; Continuous grazing; Grazing land; Soil health indicators; Soil organic carbon; ORGANIC-MATTER; LAND-USE; NITROGEN DYNAMICS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODEL; WATER; EROSION; SWAT; GRASSLANDS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108234
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Globally, grazing lands represent a major carbon (C) sink. However, improper use of these ecosystems can degrade their soils and their C storage capacity. Specifically, prolonged high stocking rates in livestock pro-duction can result in significantly less soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil fertility in grazing lands. This underlines the need to assess key soil health indicators to determine the ecological efficacy of grazing management. The objective of this study was to identify the impacts of alternative grazing management practices, including heavy continuous (HC), light continuous (LC), and adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing, on SOC and soil health indicators at the ranch and watershed scales in the Lower Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River Watershed in Northwest Texas. The stocking rate was the same under AMP and HC grazing, and it was reduced by half under LC grazing. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool-Carbon (SWAT-C) model was modified and used to conduct this assessment over a 40 year period (1979-2018), after a 900-year spin-up simulation (800 years under natural condition and 100 years under the HC grazing) to initiate the SOC pool. The simulated SOC was validated using observed data from several sampling locations. The study results indicated that when grazing management at the study ranch was changed from the current AMP grazing to hypothetical HC grazing, simulated average annual SOC decreased from 84 to 81.8 Mg/ha (a 2.6% decline). At the watershed-scale, when the grazing management was changed from the baseline HC grazing to AMP grazing, the simulated average annual SOC increased from 35.6 to 38.3 Mg/ha (a 7.5% increase). The net primary productivity (NPP), evapotranspiration (ET), biomass C, and soil nitrogen (N) increased, while C losses from runoff, and sediment loads decreased under AMP grazing. These results indicate that compared to HC, AMP grazing performed better with respect to SOC increase, and improvement of soil ecosystem and hydrological functions at both the ranch and watershed scales in the study watershed. Our findings suggest the need to shift from continuous to AMP grazing in order to improve soil health at multiple spatial scales.Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Challenges and Potentials for Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Forage and Grazing Systems
    Sarkar, Reshmi
    Corriher-Olson, Vanessa
    Long, Charles
    Somenahally, Anil
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 73 (06) : 786 - 795
  • [32] Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis
    Payen, Florian Thomas
    Sykes, Alasdair
    Aitkenhead, Matt
    Alexander, Peter
    Moran, Dominic
    MacLeod, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
  • [33] Evaluating soil organic carbon sequestration potential in the Cotton Belt with the soil conditioning index
    Franzluebbers, A. J.
    Hubbs, M. D.
    Norfleet, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2012, 67 (05) : 378 - 389
  • [34] Soil carbon sequestration
    Bruce A. McCarl
    F. Blaine Metting
    Charles Rice
    Climatic Change, 2007, 80 : 1 - 3
  • [35] Soil carbon sequestration
    Bernoux, M
    Feller, C
    Cerri, CC
    Eschenbrenner, V
    Cerri, CEP
    SOIL EROSION AND CARBON DYNAMICS, 2006, : 13 - +
  • [36] Continuous No-Till Impacts on Soil Biophysical Carbon Sequestration
    Sundermeier, A. P.
    Islam, K. R.
    Raut, Y.
    Reeder, R. C.
    Dick, W. A.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (05) : 1779 - 1788
  • [37] Soil carbon sequestration
    McCarl, Bruce A.
    Metting, F. Blaine
    Rice, Charles
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 80 (1-2) : 1 - 3
  • [38] Biochar: Carbon Sequestration, Land Remediation, and Impacts on Soil Microbiology
    Ennis, Christopher J.
    Evans, A. Garry
    Islam, Meez
    Ralebitso-Senior, T. Komang
    Senior, Eric
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 42 (22) : 2311 - 2364
  • [39] Carbon sequestration in soil
    Lal, Rattan
    Negassa, Wakene
    Lorenz, Klaus
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 15 : 79 - 86
  • [40] Sequestration of carbon by soil
    Swift, RS
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2001, 166 (11) : 858 - 871