Kinetic solubility: Experimental and machine-learning modeling perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Baybekov, Shamkhal [1 ]
Llompart, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Marcou, Gilles [1 ]
Gizzi, Patrick [4 ]
Galzi, Jean-Luc [3 ,5 ]
Ramos, Pascal [6 ]
Saurel, Olivier [6 ]
Bourban, Claire [4 ]
Minoletti, Claire [2 ]
Varnek, Alexandre [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Le Bel, Lab Chemoinformat UMR 7140 CNRS, Strasbourg, France
[2] Sanofi, IDD CADD, Vitry Sur Seine, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg, Ecole Super Biotechnol Strasbourg, Biotechnol & Signalisat Cellulaire UMR 7242 CNRS, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, Plateforme Chim Biol Integrat Strasbourg UAR 3286, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France
[5] ENSCM 240, ChemBioFrance Chimiotheque Natl UAR 3035, Montpellier, France
[6] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier UT3, Univ Toulouse, Inst Pharmacol & Biol Struct IPBS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[7] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Le Bel, Lab Chemoinformat UMR 7140 CNRS, 4 Rue Blaise Pascal, F-67081 Strasbourg, France
关键词
comparison; kinetic solubility; QSPR; thermodynamic solubility; DRUG DISCOVERY; FRAGMENT;
D O I
10.1002/minf.202300216
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Kinetic aqueous or buffer solubility is important parameter measuring suitability of compounds for high throughput assays in early drug discovery while thermodynamic solubility is reserved for later stages of drug discovery and development. Kinetic solubility is also considered to have low inter-laboratory reproducibility because of its sensitivity to protocol parameters [1]. Presumably, this is why little efforts have been put to build QSPR models for kinetic in comparison to thermodynamic aqueous solubility. Here, we investigate the reproducibility and modelability of kinetic solubility assays. We first analyzed the relationship between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data, and then examined the consistency of data from different kinetic assays. In this contribution, we report differences between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data that are consistent with those reported by others [1, 2] and good agreement between data from different kinetic solubility campaigns in contrast to general expectations. The latter is confirmed by achieving high performing QSPR models trained on merged kinetic solubility datasets. The poor performance of QSPR model trained on thermodynamic solubility when applied to kinetic solubility dataset reinforces the conclusion that kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities do not correlate: one cannot be used as an ersatz for the other. This encourages for building predictive models for kinetic solubility. The kinetic solubility QSPR model developed in this study is freely accessible through the Predictor web service of the Laboratory of Chemoinformatics (). This contribution presents a new publicly available dataset of kinetic solubility for 56k compounds, a comparison of kinetic and thermodynamic measurements and new publicly available QSPR models.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stable machine-learning parameterization of subgrid processes for climate modeling at a range of resolutions
    Yuval, Janni
    O'Gorman, Paul A.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [42] Stable machine-learning parameterization of subgrid processes for climate modeling at a range of resolutions
    Janni Yuval
    Paul A. O’Gorman
    Nature Communications, 11
  • [43] Ecophysiological Modeling of Grapevine Water Stress in Burgundy Terroirs by a Machine-Learning Approach
    Brillante, Luca
    Mathieu, Olivier
    Leveque, Jean
    Bois, Benjamin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 7
  • [44] An Interpretable Machine-learning Framework for Modeling High-resolution Spectroscopic Data*
    Gully-Santiago, Michael
    Morley, Caroline V.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 941 (02):
  • [45] Machine-learning and mechanistic modeling of metastatic breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment
    Benzekry, Sebastien
    Mastri, Michalis
    Nicolo, Chiara
    Ebos, John M. L.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 20 (05)
  • [46] Using machine-learning modeling to understand macroscopic dynamics in a system of coupled maps
    Borra, Francesco
    Baldovin, Marco
    CHAOS, 2021, 31 (02)
  • [47] Modeling pulsed laser micromachining of micro geometries using machine-learning techniques
    Teixidor, D.
    Grzenda, M.
    Bustillo, A.
    Ciurana, J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2015, 26 (04) : 801 - 814
  • [48] Identifying Reliable Predictors of Educational Outcomes Through Machine-Learning Predictive Modeling
    Musso, Mariel F.
    Cascallar, Eduardo C.
    Bostani, Neda
    Crawford, Michael
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2020, 5
  • [49] Applications of machine-learning interatomic potentials for modeling ceramics, glass, and electrolytes: A review
    Urata, Shingo
    Bertani, Marco
    Pedone, Alfonso
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 107 (12) : 7665 - 7691
  • [50] Modeling pulsed laser micromachining of micro geometries using machine-learning techniques
    D. Teixidor
    M. Grzenda
    A. Bustillo
    J. Ciurana
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, 26 : 801 - 814