Spillover Effects of Preventive Regulation and Corporate R&D Investment Catering: Evidence from China

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Yi-Tsung [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, Dept Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Dept Accounitng, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, 11-33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R&D expense inquiry letter (RDIL); R&D investment intensity; deterrence theory; R&D manipulation; product market competition; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2023.2218969
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the spillover effect of proactive preventive regulation represented by R&D expense inquiry letters (hereafter, RDILs) and its impact mechanism. Using deterrence theory and Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015-2020, we find that the industry receiving RDILs has a regulation effect on the R&D investment intensity catering motive of the non-receiving firms in the industry. That is, there is an industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation. The results of the regulatory mechanism analysis show that the industry spillover effect of RDILs regulation is more pronounced for non-receiving firms with more severe R&D manipulation intensity or weaker product market competitive positions. Further analysis shows that the inclusion of peer comparison questions in the RDILs increases the industry spillover effect of the inquiry letter regulation. We also find that the industry spillover effects of RDILs regulation result in higher future innovation quality for non-receiving firms. Overall, our study enriches our understanding of the effectiveness of inquiry letter regulation and provides some guidance for regulators' regulatory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3401
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does financialization affect firm' R&D investment? Evidence from China
    Liu, Li
    He, Jun
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [42] Tax incentive, R&D investment and firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Tian, Binbin
    Yu, Baixue
    Chen, Shi
    Ye, Jingjing
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2020, 71
  • [43] Complementarities between R&D investment and exporting-Evidence from China
    Wang, Fang
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 31 : 217 - 227
  • [44] Female executives and corporate R&D manipulation behavior: Evidence from China
    Mao, Jinzhou
    Xu, Donghai
    Yang, Shaoze
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 57
  • [45] Accounting Conservatism, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China
    Shen, Yi
    Ruan, Qingsong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [46] Foreign direct investment, R&D and spillover efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms
    Chuang, YC
    Lin, CM
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1999, 35 (04): : 117 - 137
  • [47] Corporate ESG decoupling and R&D investment
    Sun, Yicheng
    Tao, Qizhi
    Wang, Du
    Zhang, Wan
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 75
  • [48] Cybersecurity policy and corporate R&D investment
    Nong, Huihui
    Lin, Yinghao
    Zhang, Quankun
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 75
  • [49] R&D Investment as a Signal in Corporate Takeovers
    Pilar Socorro, M.
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2009, 30 (05) : 335 - 350
  • [50] R&D spillover effects on firms' export behavior: evidence from South Korea
    Kim, Minjung
    Choi, Moon Jung
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (28) : 3066 - 3080