Is reusable packaging an environmentally friendly alternative to the single-use plastic bag? A case study of express delivery packaging in China

被引:20
|
作者
Tan, Quanyin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Liyao [2 ,4 ]
Wei, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yuan [2 ]
Li, Jinhui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Room 804,Sino Italian Environm & Energy Efficient, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Room 805,Sino Italian Environm & Energy Efficient, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Plastic pollution; Single-use plastic; Plastic delivery packaging; Reusable delivery box; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MARINE-ENVIRONMENT; WASTE; PERSPECTIVES; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106863
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of employing single-use plastic delivery bags (SPDBs) as express delivery packaging has led to serious resource depletion and environmental pollution. To mitigate these environmental threats, reusable plastic delivery boxes (RPDBs) were developed as an alternative option. This study utilized the life cycle assessment method to compare the environmental impacts of RPDBs and SPDBs. The results indicated that RPDBs cause fewer environmental impacts than SPDBs during intra-city delivery but higher impacts during inter-city delivery. Greenhouse gas emissions from plastic production were found to be the largest impact contributor, mainly from fossil energy generation during primary plastic pelleting. Increasing the average number of reuse cycles of RPDBs to 50, by 2025, would generate 6.24 million kg CO2-eq but could reduce CO2-eq emissions by 309.3 million kg and tons of plastic wastes by 0.96 million, compared to using SPDBs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Consumer perceptions and behaviors toward take-out food plastic packaging reduction: A case study of college students in China
    Guan Y.
    Wei F.
    Liu S.
    Tan Q.
    Li J.
    Circular. Econ., 2023, 3
  • [42] Clinical comparative study of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones: a retrospective case-controlled study
    Jing, Qiang
    Liu, Fan
    Yuan, Xiaobin
    Zhang, Xuhui
    Cao, Xiaoming
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [43] A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes
    Usawachintachit, Manint
    Isaacson, Dylan S.
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Tzou, David T.
    Hsi, Ryan S.
    Sherer, Benjamin A.
    Stoller, Marshall L.
    Chi, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (05): : 468 - 475
  • [44] Examining the Relationship between Environmentally Friendly Land Use and Rural Revitalization Using a Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of Hainan Province, China
    Wang, Pai
    Qi, Mengna
    Liang, Yajia
    Ling, Xuebing
    Song, Yan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (22)
  • [45] Assessing the impact of banning the single-use plastic carrier bags: a case study for Kenyan marine environment looking at macro, meso, and microplastics
    Kosore, Charles
    Waiyaki, Edward
    Kimanga, Faith
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (03)
  • [46] Assessing the impact of banning the single-use plastic carrier bags: a case study for Kenyan marine environment looking at macro, meso, and microplastics
    Charles Kosore
    Edward Waiyaki
    Faith Kimanga
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [47] The relationship between low-consumption single-use plastic awareness and behaviour: a case study of FPT University students (Ho Chi Minh Branch)
    Nguyen, Nhi Yen
    Tran, Hao Gia
    Tra, Dang Thanh
    Le, Nhung Tuyet
    Nguyen, Hien Thi Thuy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025, 26 (01) : 201 - 216