Solution approaches for the bi-objective Skiving Stock Problem

被引:2
|
作者
Karaca, Tolga Kudret [1 ]
Samanlioglu, Funda [2 ]
Altay, Ayca [3 ]
机构
[1] Topkapi Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-34087 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, 96 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
Skiving Stock Problem; Lexicographic method; Bi-objective programming; Column generation; Integer programming; Dragonfly algorithm; LINEAR-PROGRAMMING APPROACH; CUTTING-STOCK; PACKING; OPTIMIZATION; INSTANCES; PAPER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2023.109164
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The Skiving Stock Problem (SSP) aims to determine an optimal plan for producing as many large objects as possible by combining small items. The skiving process may need different considerations depending on the production environment and the product characteristics. In this study, we address bi-objective 1D-SSP with two conflicting objectives. One common objective is to minimize the trim loss remaining after skiving, as removing the excess width is an extra procedure. When welding is an element of the skiving process, increasing the number of items for each product indicates compromised quality. Therefore, minimizing the number of small items for each product becomes a primary objective in such cases. To solve this bi-objective version of the NP-hard problem, we implement a Lexicographic Method (LM) in which the importance of the objectives imposes their preference orders. We propose two methodologies within the LM framework. The first methodology integrates Column Generation (CG) and Branch & Bound (B&B) to search for an exact solution. Given the excessive computational time an exact solver may require for tight or large-sized problems, we propose a heuristic method integrating the Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) and a Constructive Heuristic (CH). Real-world application results validate the exact solver and demonstrate comparable results for the heuristic solver in terms of solution quality and computational time. The efficiency of the solution methodologies for a preemptive multi-objective SSP aims to support decision-makers with make-or-buy decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The bi-objective stochastic covering tour problem
    Tricoire, Fabien
    Graf, Alexandra
    Gutjahr, Walter J.
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (07) : 1582 - 1592
  • [32] An exact algorithm for the bi-objective timing problem
    Sophie Jacquin
    Fanny Dufossé
    Laetitia Jourdan
    Optimization Letters, 2018, 12 : 903 - 914
  • [33] A study of the bi-objective next release problem
    Juan J. Durillo
    Yuanyuan Zhang
    Enrique Alba
    Mark Harman
    Antonio J. Nebro
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2011, 16 : 29 - 60
  • [34] The bi-objective critical node detection problem
    Ventresca, Mario
    Harrison, Kyle Robert
    Ombuki-Berman, Beatrice M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 265 (03) : 895 - 908
  • [35] Bi-objective green vehicle routing problem
    Erdogdu, Kazim
    Karabulut, Korhan
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (03) : 1602 - 1626
  • [36] The Steiner bi-objective shortest path problem
    Ben Ticha, Hamza
    Absi, Nabil
    Feillet, Dominique
    Quilliot, Alain
    EURO JOURNAL ON COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 9
  • [37] Heuristics for the bi-objective path dissimilarity problem
    Marti, Rafael
    Gonzalez Velarde, Jose Luis
    Duarte, Abraham
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (11) : 2905 - 2912
  • [38] Evolutionary approaches with adaptive operators for the bi-objective TTP
    Santana, Roberto
    Shakya, Sidhartha
    2022 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2022, : 1202 - 1209
  • [39] Optimization of fuzzy bi-objective fractional assignment problem
    Gupta, Neha
    OPSEARCH, 2019, 56 (03) : 1091 - 1102
  • [40] Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Bi-objective Assignment Problem
    Ratli, Mustapha
    Eddaly, Mansour
    Jarboui, Bassem
    Lecomte, Sylvain
    Hanafi, Said
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (IEEE-IESM 2013), 2013, : 35 - 40