Safety and efficacy of combined ropivacaine and sufentanil compared with ropivacaine for cesarean sections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Fadlalmola, Hammad A. [1 ]
Elhusein, Amal M. [2 ,3 ]
Albadrani, Muayad S. [4 ]
Masada, Huda K. [5 ]
Abdalla, Adel M. A.
Elhussain, Mariam Y. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
El-Amin, Ehab I. [8 ]
Azeem, Fatma M. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Taibah Univ, Nursing Coll, Dept Community Hlth Nursing, Medina, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Bisha, Coll Appl Med Sci, Nursing Dept, Bisha, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Khartoum, Fac Nursing, Khartoum, Sudan
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Med, Medina, Saudi Arabia
[5] Hafr Albatin Univ, Appl Med Coll, Nursing Dept, Al Batin, Saudi Arabia
[6] Shaqra Univ, Appl Med Coll, Nursing Dept, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia
[7] Alzaiem Alazhari Univ, Med Tech colleague, Khartoum, Sudan
[8] Fac Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol, Al Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH | 2023年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
Efficacy; ropivacaine; sufentanil; cesarean sections; systematic review; meta-analysis; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL; HYPERBARIC ROPIVACAINE; EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; FENTANYL; BUPIVACAINE; DELIVERY; ANALGESIA; MORPHINE;
D O I
10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i1.9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Cesarean sections are the most common operations in the United States and one of the most common worldwide. Using the lowest possible dose of anesthetic that provides painless delivery with the lowest adverse events is a major concern. We investigated the efficacy and safety of combined ropivacaine and sufentanil by pooling data from relevant studies. We searched PubMed, Web of sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until the end of December 2021 and included all records with data about combined ropivacaine and sufentanil. We used Review Manager to pool data as a mean difference for continuous outcomes or risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. Methodological quality was appraised using version one of the Cochrane risks of bias tool. Seven Randomized clinical trials with a total sample size of 730 women were included; the mean age of enrolled parturients ranged from 28 to 35 years. We found that combined sufentanil and ropivacaine were significantly associated with decreased risk of being aware and nervous during CS (presented by Sedation level 1) (RR: 0.05, 95%CI [0.01,0.33], P=0.002), decreased risk of shivering (RR=0.29, 95%CI [0.19,0.44], P<0.00001), nausea (RR=0.62, 95%CI [0.41, 0.92], P=0.02), and vomiting (RR=0.27, 95% CI [0.12, 0.61], P=0.002). However, combined sufentanil and ropivacaine slightly were associated with late-onset of sensory blockade (MD=0.41, 95%CI [0.13, 0.68], P=0.004) and less motor blockade of leg flexion at hip joint presented by Bromage Scale 0 (RR=7.15 95%CI [2.71, 18.86], P<0.0001). Combined ropivacaine and sufentanil were associated with a reduction in visceral pain and lower risks of hypotension, shivering, nausea, and vomiting, compared to isolated ropivacaine, with no difference regarding the incidence of bradycardia. Although Combined ropivacaine and sufentanil were associated with a higher risk of pruritus, the incidence of pruritus was reportedly proportionate with the used dose of sufentanil. However, combined ropivacaine and sufentanil may slightly delay the onset of the sensory blockade to pinprick at T10 with less motor blockade but with a smaller probability for women to be aware and nervous during CS. (Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27 [1]: 95-106).
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 106
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The different doses of sufentanil combined with nalmefene in bronchoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zhanqi
    Zhang, Junting
    Wang, Zhongqun
    Petrella, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (06) : 3956 - 3966
  • [32] Efficacy of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in preventing peribulbar block failure: A meta-analysis
    Miranda, Denismar B.
    Bastos, Marcela M. A.
    Goveia, Catia S.
    Silva, Rodrigo E.
    Rodrigues, Francisco W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 2731 - 2737
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Lador, Adi
    Paul, Mical
    Leibovici, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (09) : 1963 - 1971
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) : 1886 - 1887
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of bromelain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Petchsomrit, Arpa
    Janurai, Thitapa
    Saechan, Charinrat
    Sunsandee, Niti
    NUTRITION AND HEALTH, 2023, 29 (03) : 479 - 503
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Fraser, Abigail
    Sarid, Nadav
    Leibovici, Leonard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (05): : 338 - 348
  • [37] Efficacy and Safety of Seprafilm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Masato Kusunoki
    World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 1886 - 1887
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teresa Rosanova, Maria
    Bes, David
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    Sberna, Norma
    Herrera-Ramos, Estefania
    Luis Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 6
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of ceftaroline: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rosanova, Maria T.
    Aguilar, Pedro S.
    Sberna, Norma
    Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 6
  • [40] Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions in repeated cesarean sections: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Shafti, Vida
    Azarboo, Alireza
    Ghaemi, Marjan
    Gargari, Omid Kohandel
    Madineh, Erfan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 287 : 97 - 108