Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation

被引:7
|
作者
Takaki, Shu [1 ,3 ]
Miyama, Hiroshi [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaken Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Med Affairs Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] Kaken Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Med Affairs Dept, 28-8,Honkomagome 2 chome,Bunkyo ku, Tokyo 1138650, Japan
关键词
Cost analysis; intradiscal enzyme injection; lumber disc herniation; condoliase;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2023.2173465
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Aims This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of intradiscal condoliase injection compared to surgical or conservative treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who are refractory to conservative treatment. Methods We performed the following cost-effectiveness analyses: (I) condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. open surgery from the beginning, (II) condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. endoscopic surgery from the beginning, and (III) condoliase + conservative treatment vs. conservative treatment. In the first two comparisons with surgical treatments, we assumed that utilities were equal in both groups and estimated the tangible (treatment, adverse events, postoperative follow-up) and intangible (mental and physical burden, and productivity loss) costs based on the existing literature, the medical expense scoring table, and online questionnaire. In the last comparison without surgical treatment, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness. Results The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 701,643 yen, with a reduction of 663,369 in comparison to that of open surgery from the beginning (1,365,012 yen). The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 643,909 yen, with a reduction of 514,909 in comparison to that of endoscopic surgery from the beginning (1,158,817 yen). ICER was 1.58 million yen/QALY (Delta QALY = 0.119, 95% confidence interval: 0.059-0.180; Delta cost = 188,809 yen at 2 years post-treatment). Conclusions Condoliase as a first line treatment option ahead of surgical treatment for LDH is superior, from a cost perspective, to surgical treatment from the beginning. Condoliase is also a cost-effective alternative to non-surgery conservative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 242
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost comparison of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema
    Nuwayhid, Rima
    Langer, Stefan
    von Dercks, Nikolaus
    CHIRURGIE, 2025, 96 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [32] Cost-utility Analysis for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Conservative Treatment Versus Discectomy Versus Discectomy With Fusion
    Selva-Sevilla, Carmen
    Ferrara, Paula
    Geroninio-Pardo, Manuel
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (05): : E228 - E234
  • [33] Meta-analysis of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs. fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
    Ding, Weilan
    Yin, Jianjian
    Yan, Ting
    Nong, Luming
    Xu, Nanwei
    ORTHOPADE, 2018, 47 (07): : 574 - 584
  • [34] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF AZACITIDINE VS. DECITABINE IN THE TREATMENT OF MYLODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES IN CHINA
    Zhao, M.
    Chen, B.
    Wu, R.
    Fan, C. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S46 - S46
  • [35] Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Versus Conservative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures
    Aras, Efe Levent
    Bunger, Cody
    Hansen, Ebbe Stender
    Sogaard, Rikke
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (04) : 337 - 343
  • [37] A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence
    Richardson, Monica L.
    Sokol, Eric R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05)
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)
    Aichmair, A.
    Burgstaller, J. M.
    Schwenkglenks, M.
    Steurer, J.
    Porchet, F.
    Brunner, F.
    Farshad, M.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (02) : 501 - 509
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)
    A. Aichmair
    J. M. Burgstaller
    M. Schwenkglenks
    J. Steurer
    F. Porchet
    F. Brunner
    M. Farshad
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 501 - 509
  • [40] aPCC vs. rFVIIa for the Treatment of Bleeding in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia - a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Kim, Chong H.
    Simmons, Sierra C.
    Bui, Chau M.
    Jiang, Ning
    Pham, Huy P.
    TRANSFUSION, 2018, 58 : 165A - 165A