Environmental impact assessment of aluminum electrolytic capacitors in a product family from the manufacturer's perspective

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Haihong [1 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [1 ]
Jing, Junfeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, 193 Tunxi Rd, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, 9 Seyuan Rd, Nantong 226019, Peoples R China
[3] Nantong Jianghai Capacitor Corp, Technol Dev Dept, 79 Tongyang South Rd, Nantong 226361, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT | 2023年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Aluminum electrolytic capacitors; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Capacitor production process; Multiple capacitor specifications; Environmental management; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BATTERIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02117-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeAluminum electrolytic capacitors (AECs) are a type of indispensable electronic components in modern electronic and electrical products. They are designed and manufactured by a series of product specifications to meet the requirements of a variety of application scenarios. Efficient assessment of the potential environmental impact on AECs with different specification parameters in the product family is essential to implement sustainable product development for the manufacturers. MethodsA cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to evaluate the environmental impact of 38 types of AECs in a product family from the manufacturer's perspective. In the study, 100,000 AECs with specific rated working voltage (among 16 V, 25 V, and 35 V) and rated capacitance (among 4.7 to 6800 mu F) produced by a capacitor manufacturer from Nantong, China, were selected as the functional unit. In the life cycle inventory (LCI) analysis, a parametric LCI model for the product family was established by combining product family parameterization and production process parameterization. The impact assessment method, ReCiPe2016 (midpoint, hierarchist perspective), was used to quantitatively calculate the potential environmental impacts of the AECs. Results and discussionBased on the generated LCIs of the AECs and ReCiPe2016, fossil depletion, climate change, and terrestrial ecotoxicity were identified as the key environmental impact categories in the production stage for the AEC product family. The environmental impacts of fossil consumption, climate change, and terrestrial ecotoxicity per functional unit ranged from 263 to 6777 kg oil equivalent, 884 to 23,760 kg CO2 equivalent, and 573 to 47,340 kg 1,4-DB equivalent, respectively. The environmental impact differences among the product family due to the differences in AECs' specifications were compared. Aluminum ingots (anode), aluminum ingots (cathode), case, and electricity are the main contributors to the environmental impacts, accounting for over 85% of carbon emissions, over 70% of fossil consumption, and over 62% of terrestrial ecotoxicity. Sensitivity analysis of 12 parameters was investigated. ConclusionsThe results and the conclusions provide a solid foundation for capacitor manufacturers to carry out eco-design development, environmental management, and green marketing. The effect of eco-design optimization and process improvement of the AECs can be quantitatively compared through the established model. Furthermore, the study supports the application and promotion of the AEC eco-label with specific specifications in the AEC industry. The methodology also gives guidance for the LCA studies of product families of other electronic and electrical components.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 94
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adverse environmental impact: A consultant's perspective
    Wells, AW
    Englert, TL
    DEFINING AND ASSESSING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM POWER PLANT IMPINGEMENT AND ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS, 2003, : 185 - 197
  • [42] Environmental and Economic Assessment of Pre-training Electrolytic Aluminum Production -A case study of China
    Hong, Jingmin
    Ismail, Zainab Z.
    Hong, Jinglan
    ADVANCES IN SUPERALLOYS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 146-147 : 996 - +
  • [43] Parameters for Environmental Impact Assessment of Product Packaging: A Delphi Study
    Sumer Singh
    Jyoti Kumar
    P. V. M. Rao
    Journal of Packaging Technology and Research, 2018, 2 (1) : 3 - 15
  • [44] ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT - A FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT AND PRODUCT EVALUATION
    ROBERTS, PW
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 1988, 23 (03) : 231 - 241
  • [45] Assessment of cathode active materials from the perspective of integrating environmental impact with electrochemical performance
    Yu, Yajuan
    Wang, Dong
    Huang, Kai
    Wang, Xiang
    Liang, Yuhan
    Sun, Weijun
    Chen, Bo
    Chen, Shi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 82 : 213 - 220
  • [46] THE WIDER IMPACT OF CHRONIC DISEASES ON FAMILY AND SOCIETY - FROM THE CARER'S PERSPECTIVE
    Doehner, H.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2013, 71 : 35 - 35
  • [47] Strategic management of store brands: an analysis from the manufacturer's perspective
    Oubina, Javier
    Rubio, Natalia
    Jesus Yaguee, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 34 (10) : 742 - +
  • [48] Exploration into a New Dicarboxylic Acid Derived from Ricinoleic Acid for High-Performance Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors
    Mizota, Isao
    Umeshima, Satoshi
    Matsunaga, Sei
    Isomura, Rinpei
    Nakahama, Kenta
    Shimizu, Makoto
    Yokomori, Yorozu
    Umemura, Tokihiro
    Kuroki, Noburo
    Kiyosawa, Junich
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2016, 89 (11) : 1368 - 1374
  • [49] Determination of the optimal warranty policy and period from the manufacturer's/seller's perspective
    Mutlu, Hakan Tahiri
    Yildiz, Mehmet Selami
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 52 (08) : 3612 - 3634
  • [50] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCT LIFESPAN: THE ROLE OF CONSUMER'S REPAIR BEHAVIOR AND CRITICAL COMPONENTS DETERIORATION
    Sabbaghi, Mostafa
    Behdad, Sara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2A, 2016,