Hont and Koselleck on the Crisis of Authority

被引：0

作者：

Andersen, Lasse S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Hist, Dept Modern Hist, St Andrews, Scotland

来源：

JOURNAL OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY | 2023年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

Istvan Hont; Reinhart Koselleck; reason of state; public debt; crisis; political authority; Adam Smith; Emmanuel Sieyes; BEGRIFFSGESCHICHTE;

D O I：

10.1163/18722636-12341506

中图分类号：

K [历史、地理];

学科分类号：

06 ;

摘要：

This paper examines the reception of Reinhart Koselleck's Kritik und Krise by the intellectual historian Istvan Hont. Relying on hitherto unpublished manuscripts, it argues that the later work of Hont can be seen as a critical response to Koselleck and his characterisation of the crisis of modern politics as a crisis of political authority.

引用

页码：357 / 379

页数：23

共 50 条

[31] The concept of crisis in Reinhart Koselleck. Polysemies of a Historical Category.
Lucila Svampa, Maria
ANACRONISMO E IRRUPCION, 2016, 6 (11): : 131 - 151
[32] CRITICISM AND CRISIS - A STUDY ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF THE BOURGEOIS WORLD - GERMAN - KOSELLECK,R
FRIEDRICH, CJ
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1960, 54 (03) : 746 - 747
[33] The Concept of Politics. The Modernity as a Time of Crisis in the Work of Reinhart Koselleck
Consolati, Isabella
FILOSOFIA POLITICA, 2020, 34 (01) : 166 - 168
[34] The impasses of authority. A systemic criticism of the crisis of authority
Le Goff, Jean-Francois
THERAPIE FAMILIALE, 2009, 30 (03): : 401 - 419
[35] FORMAN,MILOS AND THE CRISIS OF AUTHORITY
SCHEPELERN, P
KOSMORAMA, 1982, 28 (158): : 46 - 55
[36] CRISIS IN AUTHORITY - FAILURE OF MODEL
GAYLIN, W
PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 1972, 46 (04) : 563 - 571
[37] STEVENS,WALLACE AND THE CRISIS OF AUTHORITY
FILREIS, A
AMERICAN LITERATURE, 1984, 56 (04) : 560 - 578
[38] AUTHORITY CRISIS IN CHINESE POLITICS
PYE, LW
DIALOGUE-JOURNAL OF PHI SIGMA TAU, 1969, 2 (04): : 23 - 33
[39] CRISIS OF LEGITIMACY OF COMMUNIST AUTHORITY
AHLBERG, R
OSTEUROPA, 1990, 40 (06): : 517 - 534
[40] THE CRISIS OF AUTHORITY IN CATHOLIC MODERNITY
Misner, Paul
THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2012, 73 (01) : 228 - 229

← 1 2 3 4 5 →