The psychosocial experience of cancer: a meta-analysis of Australian rural versus urban populations

被引:0
|
作者
Barnes, Marisa [1 ]
Thorsteinsson, Einar Baldvin [1 ]
Rice, Kylie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Psychol, Armidale, Australia
关键词
Australia; cancer; psycho-oncology; psychological distress; rural; wellbeing; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PATIENT OUTCOMES; CARE; SUPPORT; WOMEN; NEEDS; SERVICE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1080/00050067.2023.2270133
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Understanding the psychological wellbeing of people with cancer is a key component of assessment and intervention in quality cancer care. However, the unique experiences of rural cancer populations are less often explored than those from urban centres. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of Australian studies that compared the psychological wellbeing experiences of people with cancer from rural and urban locations.Methods: Five databases were searched, and 19 studies, involving 16,947 participants, assessing and comparing the psychological wellbeing of rural and urban populations with cancer were included.Results: The analysis indicated that Australian rural cancer populations have greater odds of worse psychological wellbeing than those from urban areas (OR = 1.54, 95% CI [1.01, 2.35], p = 0.044). This disparity remains when cancer types are analysed separately, with a slightly smaller odds ratio for rural people with breast cancer (OR = 1.29, 95%CI [1.01, 1.64], p = 0.046) and a slightly larger odds ratio when cancers excluding breast cancer were reviewed (OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.59, 2.01], p = <.001). Significant heterogeneity was found.Conclusions; Despite increasing emphasis in Australia on psychological wellbeing throughout the cancer journey, there remain significant disparities whereby rural people experience greater impacts upon their psychological wellbeing. The wellbeing of Australian rural populations with cancer remains an area in which clinical and political focus is imperative. Whilst screening is a necessary first step, additional clinical implications for improving rural access to appropriately skilled health professionals who provide oncology-specific assessment and intervention are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 302
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Omer Aziz
    Vasilis Constantinides
    Paris P. Tekkis
    Thanos Athanasiou
    Sanjay Purkayastha
    Paraskevas Paraskeva
    Ara W. Darzi
    Alexander G. Heriot
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006, 13 : 413 - 424
  • [42] Prostatectomy Versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Luo, Xiaojin
    Yi, Meilian
    Hui, Qun
    Yin, Weihua
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 110 (01) : 78 - 85
  • [43] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Constantinides, V
    Tekkis, PP
    Athanasiou, T
    Purkayastha, S
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, AW
    Heriot, AG
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 413 - 424
  • [44] A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Shen, Wei-Song
    Xi, Hong-Qing
    Chen, Lin
    Wei, Bo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (10): : 2795 - 2802
  • [45] Robotic versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Sameer Memon
    Alexander G. Heriot
    Declan G. Murphy
    Mathias Bressel
    A. Craig Lynch
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 2095 - 2101
  • [46] A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wei-Song Shen
    Hong-Qing Xi
    Lin Chen
    Bo Wei
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2795 - 2802
  • [47] Robotic versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Memon, Sameer
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Bressel, Mathias
    Lynch, A. Craig
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (07) : 2095 - 2101
  • [48] Robotic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Liao, Guixiang
    Chen, Jiarong
    Ren, Chen
    Li, Rong
    Du, Shasha
    Xie, Guozhu
    Deng, Haijun
    Yang, Kaijun
    Yuan, Yawei
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [49] Psychosocial Correlates of Interpersonal Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis
    Hall, Judith A.
    Andrzejewski, Susan A.
    Yopchick, Jennelle E.
    JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 33 (03) : 149 - 180
  • [50] Psychosocial Correlates of Interpersonal Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis
    Judith A. Hall
    Susan A. Andrzejewski
    Jennelle E. Yopchick
    Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2009, 33 : 149 - 180