Mapping inland water bathymetry with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on board Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs)

被引:20
|
作者
Bandini, Filippo [1 ]
Kooij, Lukas [1 ]
Mortensen, Bjorn Karl [1 ]
Caspersen, Marie Boeskov [1 ]
Thomsen, Lasse Gammelby [1 ]
Olesen, Daniel [2 ]
Bauer-Gottwein, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Natl Space Inst, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
UAS; Drone; Water depth; Bathymetry; Sonar; GPR; CHANNEL CHANGE; ICE-THICKNESS; MULTISPECTRAL SATELLITE; RIVER BATHYMETRY; AIRBORNE LIDAR; WOODY DEBRIS; RESOLUTION; SHALLOW; LAKE; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128789
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bathymetry of inland water bodies is essential for river maintenance and flood risk management. Traditionally, in shallow water bodies, bathymetry is retrieved by operators wading through the water body with Real Time Kinematic (RTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), whilst in deeper waters, it is retrieved with sonar instruments on manned or unmanned boats. In the past, researchers have documented the use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on boats (i.e. water-coupled GPR) for monitoring the bathymetry of frozen and non -frozen water bodies. Furthermore, GPR has been used on helicopters for monitoring ice and snow thickness. However, deployment of GPR on board Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) in non-frozen inland water bodies with electric conductivity higher than 100 mu S/cm (as is common in most inland waterbodies in non-polar regions) is unexplored. In this paper, we document the possibility to use drone-borne and water-coupled GPR in several cross-sections located in three different waterbodies (1 lake and 2 rivers) in Denmark. These waterbodies had different bed sediment materials and vegetation conditions, an electric conductivity varying from 200 to 340 mu S/ cm and depths up to 2.5 m. Drone-borne GPR showed accuracy similar to water-coupled GPR when compared to RTK GNSS ground-truth measurements, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of approx. 8 cm. The only limitations of drone-borne GPR were i) more restrictive minimum depth requirement (typically 0.8-1.1 m for drone-borne GPR, while 0.3-0.4 m for water-coupled GPR) ii) requirement to fly the GPR antenna at altitudes of approx. 0.5 m above the water surface to avoid high spreading losses and strong surface clutter events hiding the signal. Finally, GPR measurements were benchmarked against traditional sonar measurements, showing that GPR measurements significantly outperform sonar measurements in waterbodies with medium or high density of aquatic vegetation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mapping golf green drainage systems and subsurface features using ground penetrating radar
    Boniak, R
    Chong, SK
    Indorante, SJ
    Doolittle, JA
    GPR 2002: NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, 2002, 4758 : 477 - 481
  • [32] Applying 2-D Resistivity Imaging and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Methods to Identify Infiltration of Water in the Ground Surface
    Yusof, Azim Hilmy Mohamad
    Azman, Muhamad Iqbal Mubarak Faharul
    Ismail, Nur Azwin
    Ismail, Noer El Hidayah
    1ST INTERNATIONAL GEO-ELECTROMAGNETIC WORKSHOP (GEO-EM 2017), 2017, 1861
  • [33] Monitoring underground water leakage pattern by ground penetrating radar (GPR) using 800 MHz antenna frequency
    Amran, T. S. T.
    Ismail, M. P.
    Ahmad, M. R.
    Amin, M. S. M.
    Ismail, M. A.
    Sani, S.
    Masenwat, N. A.
    Basri, N. S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2017 (INUSTEC2017), 2018, 298
  • [34] Ground-Penetrating Radar Water Content Mapping of Golf Course Green Sand Layers
    Allred, Barry
    Freeland, Robert
    Grote, Katherine
    McCoy, Edward
    Martinez, Luis
    Gamble, Debra
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 21 (04) : 215 - 229
  • [35] Criteria for mapping and estimation root systems using ground penetrating radar by the example of the European spruce
    Ryazantsev, Pavel A.
    Kabonen, Aleksey, V
    VESTNIK OF SAINT PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 69 (02):
  • [36] An Enhanced Data Processing Framework for Mapping Tree Root Systems Using Ground Penetrating Radar
    Lantini, Livia
    Tosti, Fabio
    Giannakis, Iraklis
    Zou, Lilong
    Benedetto, Andrea
    Alani, Amir M.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 33
  • [37] 3D Sedimentary Architecture of Sandy Braided River, Based on Outcrop, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Ground Penetrating Radar Data
    Guo, Wei
    Dong, Chunmei
    Lin, Chengyan
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhao, Zhongxiang
    Li, Jia
    MINERALS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [38] Mapping the spatial variation of soil water content at the field scale with different ground penetrating radar techniques
    Weihermueller, L.
    Huisman, J. A.
    Lambot, S.
    Herbst, M.
    Vereecken, H.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 340 (3-4) : 205 - 216
  • [39] 3D mapping of reinforcement and tendon ducts on pre-stressed concrete bridges by means of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
    Cheilakou, E.
    Theodorakeas, P.
    Koui, M.
    Zeris, C.
    SMART SENSOR PHENOMENA, TECHNOLOGY, NETWORKS, AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 2014, 2014, 9062
  • [40] Exploring the Effectiveness of Improved Reverse Time Migration on Multi-GPUs in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar
    Wang, Wuji
    Li, Tianyang
    Kong, Wenxin
    Huang, Cheng
    Yu, Tao
    Lin, Rongzhi
    Yu, Nian
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2025, 22