Subjective Well-Being and Populist Voting in the Netherlands
被引:3
|
作者:
Burger, Martijn J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Happiness Econ Res Org, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
Open Univ Netherlands, Dept Org, Heerlen, Netherlands
Univ Johannesburg, Sch Econ, Johannesburg, South AfricaErasmus Univ, Erasmus Happiness Econ Res Org, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
Burger, Martijn J.
[1
,2
,3
]
Eiselt, Susanna
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Happiness Econ Res Org, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, NetherlandsErasmus Univ, Erasmus Happiness Econ Res Org, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
Eiselt, Susanna
[1
]
机构:
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Happiness Econ Res Org, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Dept Org, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Johannesburg, Sch Econ, Johannesburg, South Africa
Subjective well-being;
Voting;
Populism;
The Netherlands;
ECONOMIC NATIONALISM;
BEHAVIOR;
VOTERS;
D O I:
10.1007/s10902-023-00685-9
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
This study analyzes whether subjective well-being can explain the populist vote in the Netherlands. Using data on voting intention and subjective well-being for over 7700 individuals from 2008 to 2019-a period during which populist parties became well-established in the Netherlands-we estimate logit and multinomial logit random effects regressions. We find evidence of an association between decreased subjective well-being and the probability to vote for a populist party that goes beyond changes in dissatisfaction with society-lack of confidence in parliament, democracy and the economy-and ideological orientation. At the same time, we find no evidence for a relationship between subjective well-being and voting for other non-incumbent parties other than populist parties.