The Association between Infant Birth Weight, Head Circumference, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

被引:3
|
作者
Costantine, Maged M. M. [1 ]
Tita, Alan T. N. [2 ]
Mele, Lisa [3 ]
Casey, Brian M. M. [4 ]
Peaceman, Alan M. M. [5 ]
Varner, Michael W. W. [6 ]
Reddy, Uma M. M. [7 ]
Wapner, Ronald J. J. [8 ]
Thorp, John M. M. [9 ]
Saade, George R. R. [10 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. J. [11 ]
Sibai, Baha [12 ]
Mercer, Brian M. M. [13 ]
Caritis, Steve N. N. [14 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Biostat Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Dallas, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
[8] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[10] Univ Texas Med Branch, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 5th Floor,12th Ave,Room 588A, Galveston, TX 43210 USA
[11] Brown Univ, Providence, RI USA
[12] Univ Texas Houston, Houston, TX USA
[13] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH USA
[14] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
birth weight; head circumference; neurodevelopmental outcomes; child IQ; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH; FETAL-GROWTH; POPULATION; PREDICTOR; AGE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-1761920
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether being small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA) or having a small or large head circumference (HC) at birth is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter negative randomized trial of thyroxine therapy for subclinical hypothyroid disorders in pregnancy. The primary outcome was child intelligence quotient (IQ) at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included several neurodevelopmental measures. Associations between the outcomes in children with SGA (< 10th percentile) or LGA (> 90th percentile) birth weights, using ethnicity- and sex-specific population nomogram as well as nomograms from the National Fetal Growth (NFG) study, were compared with the referent of those with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) birth weight. Similar analyses were performed for HC.Results Using the population nomogram, 90 (8.2%) were SGA and 112 (10.2%) were LGA. SGA neonates were more likely to be born preterm to mothers who were younger, smoked, and were less likely to have less than a high school education, whereas LGA neonates were more likely to be born to mothers who were older and have higher body mass index, compared with AGA neonates. SGA at birth was associated with a decrease in the child IQ at 5 years of age by 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-6.14) points, and an increase in odds of child with an IQ < 85 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2). There was no association between SGA and other secondary outcomes, or between LGA and the primary or secondary outcomes. Using the NFG standards, SGA at birth remained associated with a decrease in the child IQ at 5 years of age by 3.14 (95% CI, 0.22-6.05) points and higher odds of an IQ < 85 (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.1), but none of the other secondary outcomes. HC was not associated with the primary outcome, and there were no consistent associations of these standards with the secondary outcomes.Conclusion In this cohort of pregnant individuals with hypothyroid disorders, SGA birth weight was associated with a decrease in child IQ and greater odds of child IQ < 85 at 5 years of age. Using a fetal growth standard did not appear to improve the detection of newborns at risk of adverse neurodevelopment.
引用
收藏
页码:e1313 / e1323
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Weight/head circumference ratio at birth for assessing fetal growth
    Pedraza, Dixis Figueroa
    Bernardino, Italo de Macedo
    de Lima Lins, Anahi Cezar
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2022, 27 (04): : 1629 - 1640
  • [22] Repeated fetal betamethasone treatment and birth weight and head circumference
    Shelton, SD
    Boggess, KA
    Murtha, AP
    Groff, AO
    Herbert, WNP
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02): : 301 - 304
  • [23] Weight/head circumference ratio at birth for assessing fetal growth
    da Silva Pastich Goncalves, Fabiana Cristina Lima
    Cabral de Lira, Pedro Israel
    Eickmann, Sophie Helena
    Lima, Marilia de Carvalho
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2015, 31 (09): : 1995 - 2004
  • [24] Head Circumference, Birth Length, and Weight of Neonates of Mothers with Hypothyroidism
    Laron-Kenet, Tamar
    Silbergeld, Aviva
    Lilos, Pearl
    Laron, Zvi
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2018, 90 : 637 - 637
  • [25] WEIGHT, LENGTH, HEAD AND CHEST CIRCUMFERENCE AT BIRTH IN PHOENIX, ARIZONA
    BRITTON, JR
    BRITTON, HL
    JENNETT, R
    GAINES, J
    DAILY, WJR
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 38 (03) : 215 - 222
  • [26] BIRTH-WEIGHT AND HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH TWINS
    BUCKLER, JMH
    GREEN, M
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1994, 71 (06) : 516 - 521
  • [27] Supine length, weight and head circumference at birth in central Iran
    Ayatollahi, S. M. T.
    Rafiei, Mohammad
    EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2007, 177 (03) : 255 - 258
  • [28] Maternal seafood consumption and infant birth weight, length and head circumference in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study
    Brantsaeter, Anne Lise
    Birgisdottir, Bryndis Eva
    Meltzer, Helle Margrete
    Kvalem, Helen Engelstad
    Alexander, Jan
    Magnus, Per
    Haugen, Margareta
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2012, 107 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [29] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAIN-WEIGHT AND HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE FROM BIRTH TO AGE 18 YEARS
    EPSTEIN, HT
    EPSTEIN, EB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1978, 48 (04) : 471 - 473
  • [30] Birth body length, birth body weight and birth head circumference in neonates born in a single centre between 2011 and 2016
    Pawlus, Beata
    Wisniewski, Andrzej
    Kubik, Pawel
    Milde, Katarzyna
    Gmyrek, Leszek
    Pesko, Ewa
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 88 (11) : 599 - 605