How do R&D capital market distortions affect innovation efficiency in China? Some evidence about spatial interaction and spillover effects

被引:4
|
作者
Pang, Silu [1 ]
Hua, Guihong [1 ]
Liu, Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Business, 1 Wenyuan Rd, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 159 Longpan Rd, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
R&D capital market distortions; Innovation efficiency; Dynamic spatial Durbin model; Spatial spillover effect; Spatial interaction effect; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; PANEL-DATA; SUBSIDIES; SELECTION; DISTANCE; FRONTIER; NETWORK; ECONOMY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.seps.2023.101739
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Improving innovation efficiency (IE) and refining capital market distortions are important considerations for promoting national innovation strategies. This study uses the dynamic spatial Durbin model and mechanism tests to explore the direct impacts, spatial effects, and influencing mechanisms of R&D capital market distortions on IE based on Chinese provincial panel data from 2009 to 2019. The main results can be summarized as follows. First, China's IE is characterized by temporal inertia and spatial agglomeration. In both the spatial and temporal dimensions, IE in neighboring areas in the previous period can inhibit local IE in the current period. Second, R&D capital market distortions have a weakening effect on IE in the short-and long-term. Third, R&D capital market distortions have significant spatial interaction and persistent positive spatial spillover effects on IE. Finally, R&D capital mismatch and technology lock-in effects are essential mechanisms related to R&D capital market distortions that can inhibit IE. Based on these results, policy recommendations have been proposed to improve IE.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How Do Ownership Concentration and Family Control Affect R&D Investments? New Evidence from Taiwan
    Ting, Irene Wei Kiong
    Lo, Huai-Chun
    Kweh, Qian Long
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2020, 20 (01) : 275 - 291
  • [32] How do entrepreneurs' characteristics affect R&D expenditure? Evidence from small and micro Chinese firms
    Zhang, Lan
    Wang, Jiancheng
    Xiao, Yao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (53) : 6098 - 6107
  • [33] Do Innovation Incentive Policies Affect China's Agricultural Patent: Based on the Perspective of Different R&D Subjects
    Li, Zhaoliang
    Lai, Xiaomin
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (02) : 7237 - 7256
  • [34] Influences of R&D accumulation, knowledge spillover effects and spatial interactions on output of high-tech industry in China
    Zhang, Tong-Bin
    Gao, Tie-Mei
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2014, 34 (07): : 1739 - 1748
  • [35] An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China
    Liu, Weijiang
    Bai, Yue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [36] How R&D Financial Subsidies, Regional R&D Input, and Intellectual Property Protection Affect the Sustainable Patent Output of SMEs: Evidence from China
    Xu, Pengyuan
    Zhang, Meiqing
    Gui, Min
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [37] Policy-induced distortion, market-oriented correction, and R&D spatial spillover - Empirical evidence from Chinese industry
    Song, Wei
    Wang, Xiang Yao
    He, Jing
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (05): : 956 - 979
  • [38] How does China's industrial policy affect firms' R&D investment? Evidence from 'China Manufacturing 2025'
    Wen, Huwei
    Zhao, Zhao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (55) : 6333 - 6347
  • [39] How do environmental policies affect capital market reactions? Evidence from China?s construction waste treatment policy
    Liu, Haiyue
    Wang, Yile
    Shi, Xiaoshuang
    Pang, Lina
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 198
  • [40] FUNDING FORMS, MARKET CONDITIONS, AND DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT R&D SUBSIDIES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Guo, Di
    Guo, Yan
    Jiang, Kun
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2017, 55 (02) : 825 - 842