Co-producing an ecosystem services-based plan for sustainable university campuses

被引:4
|
作者
Gonzalez-Garcia, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Aguado, Mateo [1 ]
Solascasas, Paula [1 ]
Palomo, Ignacio [2 ]
Gonzalez, Jose A. [1 ,3 ]
Garcia-Llorente, Marina [1 ,3 ]
Hevia, Violeta [1 ,3 ]
Olmo, Rafael Mata [4 ,5 ]
Lopez-Santiago, Cesar A. [1 ,3 ]
Benayas, Javier [1 ]
Montes, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, 2 Edificio Biol, Madrid 28049, Spain
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP,IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Ctr Invest Biodivers & Cambio Global CIBC UAM, C Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, Spain
[4] Fdn Fernando Gonzalez Bernaldez, Oficina Tecn Europarc Espana, Madrid 28223, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Geog, Madrid 28049, Spain
关键词
Territorial planning; Social-ecological systems; Mapping; Protected areas; Resilience; University management; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; SCALE; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104630
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In the context of global change, social-ecological perspectives for organisations and territorial planning schemes are key to facilitate a transition towards sustainability. Consequently, Ecosystem Services (ES) assessment and mapping are being increasingly used to enhance knowledge co-production for more sustainable territorial management. Higher education organizations have the potential to catalyse the sustainability transition of society, but there is a lack of studies integrating novel and current sustainable development approaches in spatial planning at university campuses. Here, we proposed an integrated approach for developing an ecosystem services-based plan to manage the campus of the Autonomous University of Madrid (Spain). We developed a participatory process integrating all the various actors and the decision making-bodies of the university. This participatory process involved meetings with different groups and 2,126 surveys administrated to students, professors, researchers and administration/services staff. We also developed a technical process for assessing ES including eight ES maps (four regulating, one provisioning and three cultural), consulted with the experts and stakeholders involved, and built the final version of the planning guide integrating all perspectives to promote ES-based strategic lines. Our results showed that ES maps are useful for creating management units and for multiscale analysis. ES maps highlighted important values of the campus, allowing the integration of more social actors that allow a stronger participative process and the creation of a long-term planning scheme. However, we identified certain aspects of the ES approach that hinder real-world application, including inherent problems associated with shifting politics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainable fluoride removal with scrap aluminum: Co-producing cryolite and hydrogen
    Le, Nguyen
    Wongphoom, Titima
    Ya, Vinh
    Naddeo, Vincenzo
    Li, Chi-Wang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (06):
  • [22] Co-producing sustainable solutions in indigenous communities through scientific tourism
    Buzinde, Christine N.
    Manuel-Navarrete, David
    Swanson, Tod
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2020, 28 (09) : 1255 - 1271
  • [23] The trials and triumphs of co-producing an evaluation plan: A principles-focused evaluation
    Holly Harris
    Kayle Donner
    Jordana Rovet
    Elizabeth Rosell
    Jacob Wolframe
    Taryn Lee
    Gail Bellissimo
    Andrew Johnson
    Sophie Soklaridis
    Faisal Islam
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [24] Converging resources and co-producing for innovation: evidence from healthcare services
    Sehgal, Sanjeewani
    Gupta, Garima
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (03) : 429 - 453
  • [25] Principles for co-producing climate services: Practical insights from FRACTAL
    Mcclure, Alice
    Daron, Joseph
    Bharwani, Sukaina
    Jones, Richard
    Grobusch, Lena C.
    Kavonic, Jessica
    Janes, Tamara
    Zhang, Mary
    Hill, Erin
    Mzime, Murisa
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2024, 34
  • [26] Co-producing knowledge: the Integrated Ecosystem Model for resource management in Arctic Alaska
    Euskirchen, Eugenie S.
    Timm, Kristin
    Breen, Amy L.
    Gray, Stephen
    Rupp, T. Scott
    Martin, Philip
    Reynolds, Joel H.
    Sesser, Amanda
    Murphy, Karen
    Littell, Jeremy S.
    Bennett, Alec
    Bolton, W. Robert
    Carman, Tobey
    Genet, Helene
    Griffith, Brad
    Kurkowski, Tom
    Lara, Mark J.
    Marchenko, Sergei
    Nicolsky, Dmitry
    Panda, Santosh
    Romanovsky, Vladimir
    Rutter, Ruth
    Tucker, Colin L.
    McGuire, A. David
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 18 (08) : 447 - 455
  • [27] Ecosystem services-based composite indicator for assessing community resilience to floods
    Abenayake, C. Chethika
    Mikami, Yoshiki
    Matsuda, Yoko
    Jayasinghe, Amila
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 27 : 34 - 46
  • [28] An ecosystem services-based approach for decision-making in urban planning
    Terzi, Fatih
    Tezer, Azime
    Turkay, Zeynep
    Uzun, Osman
    Koylu, Pinar
    Karacor, Elif
    Okay, Nilgun
    Kaya, Melek
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 63 (03) : 433 - 452
  • [29] Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies
    Scolozzi, Rocco
    Schirpke, Uta
    Morri, Elisa
    D'Amato, Dalia
    Santolini, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 146 : 543 - 551
  • [30] Co-producing Gesture-Based AT - A Case Study
    Pocock, Christine
    Porter, Chris
    Agius, May
    DESIGN FOR EQUALITY AND JUSTICE, INTERACT 2023, PT II, 2024, 14536 : 277 - 282