A comparison of two techniques of internal jugular vein cannulation: Landmark-guided technique versus ultrasound-guided technique

被引:0
|
作者
Davis, Josemine [1 ,6 ]
Dwivedi, Deepak [2 ]
Sawhney, Sadhan [3 ]
Rai, Amit [1 ]
Dua, Amit [4 ]
Singh, Satyen Kumar [5 ]
机构
[1] Command Hosp Western Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Chandigarh, India
[2] Command Hosp Eastern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Kolkata, India
[3] Command Hosp Southern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Pune, India
[4] Army Hosp R&R, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[5] Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Lucknow, India
[6] Command Hosp Western Command Chandimandir, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Panchkula, Haryana, India
关键词
Cannulation; central venous catheterization; jugular vein; landmark; ultrasonography; CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION; COMPLICATIONS; CATHETERIZATION; PLACEMENT; INSERTION; ARTERIAL; GUIDANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.4103/jmms.jmms_13_22
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to compare the overall success rates and complications of two techniques of internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization, namely the landmark (LM)-based technique and ultrasound (US)-guided technique in a heterogeneous Indian population at an Armed Forces Tertiary Care Hospital. Methods: Ninety consenting patients were assigned to two groups: LM and US groups. Patients with known coagulation abnormalities, body mass index > 30, infection at the insertion site, known vascular abnormalities, burn contractures, and other dermatologic conditions that precluded an LM technique were excluded. Central venous catheterizations during the code blue scenarios were excluded due to the emergent nature of the procedure. Three operators from the author group with requisite experience in LM and US techniques performed the 90 catheterizations. In LM group, a finder needle with a 2 ml syringe was used to aspirate venous blood from the IJV. A 16G needle was guided in the same direction as the finder needle till venous blood was aspirated, followed by guidewire insertion and cannulation. In the US group, a 6-12 MHz linear US probe was used to identify the IJV in real time and a 16G needle was used to access the IJV under US guidance in the cross-sectional view. Results: The overall success rate was 84.4% in LM group and 100% in US group (P = 0.0059). The first attempt success rate was similar in both groups (71.1% and 86.6%, P = 0.07). The overall complication rates in LM group were 20%, whereas complications in the US group were 2.2% (P = 0.0073). Notably, vascular complications occurred less frequently in US group with fewer arterial punctures and hematomas. Hemothorax and pneumothorax did not occur in any group. The mean cannulation time decreased by 69 s, i.e., from 276 s in the LM group to 207 s in the US group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: US-guided central venous catheter insertion to IJV improves the overall success rate and reduces cannulation time as compared to conventional LM-based technique.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anatomical Landmark Guided versus Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Subclavian Vein Cannulation in Critically Ill Patients
    Singam, Amol P.
    Chaudhary, Ashok
    Shrey, Shruti
    JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2019, 8 (04) : 50 - 57
  • [22] Cannulation of the internal jugular vein: Comparison of the classic Seldinger technique and an ultrasound guided method
    Conz, PA
    Dissegna, D
    Rodighiero, MP
    LaGreca, G
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 1997, 10 (06) : 311 - 313
  • [23] Study between Ultrasound Guided Technique and Conventional Landmark Technique for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Ehtesham, Atiyah Misbah M.
    Patkar, Charushila
    Phalgune, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (03)
  • [24] A Descriptive Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein to Landmark-based Subclavian Vein Cannulation
    Theodoro, Daniel
    Bausano, Brian
    Lewis, Lawrence
    Evanoff, Bradley
    Kollef, Marin
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (04) : 416 - 422
  • [25] Is ultrasound guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein really superior to landmark techniques? Reply
    Farrell, J
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 13 (02) : 523 - 524
  • [26] TECHNIQUES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CANNULATION IN PATIENTS WITH A SHORT NECK
    Kasatkin, Anton
    Urakov, Aleksandr
    Shchegolev, Aleksei
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (06): : 943 - 943
  • [27] Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation: techniques to confirm guidewire location
    Maheshwari, Praveen
    Maheshwari, Parul
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2015, 62 (12): : 1344 - 1344
  • [28] Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation: techniques to confirm guidewire location
    Praveen Maheshwari
    Parul Maheshwari
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2015, 62 : 1344 - 1344
  • [29] Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs. anatomical landmark-guided cannulation of the femoral vein at the optimum position in infant
    Eldabaa, A. A.
    Elgebaly, A. S.
    Elhafz, A. A. A.
    Bassuni, A. S.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 18 (03) : 162 - 166
  • [30] Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Anatomical Landmark-Guided Thoracolumbar Retrolaminar Techniques in Canine Cadavers
    Pentsou, Julia
    Hoey, Seamus
    Vagias, Michail
    Guy, Bethany
    Huuskonen, Vilhelmiina
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (19):