Estimation of the Smallest Acceptable Sample Size in Bilateral Approaches to Coefficient Estimation and Accuracy Prediction

被引:2
|
作者
Cai, Bowen [1 ]
Wang, Xuesong [2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, England
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Transportat Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
analysis; data and data science; modeling; safety; statistical methods; DRIVING SIMULATOR; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; DRIVER PERCEPTION; VERTICAL CURVES; SAFETY; SPEED; BEHAVIOR; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231220632
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study is about smallest acceptable sample size determination in experimental design studies involving a driving simulator. The smallest acceptable sample size should be specified so researchers can make accurate inferences about their studied populations. However, the number of samples typically collected is largely subject to the expense of data collection. Working out the methodology of estimating the required number of subjects based on an initially small number is a better way for researchers to determine the smallest acceptable sample size in the experiment. Predictor estimate precision and prediction accuracy are major factors for conducting experiments. Accordingly, this study estimates the smallest acceptable sample size, with emphasis on coefficient estimation and prediction accuracy for selected significant variables. The smallest acceptable sample size is chosen to be the maximum value returned by both coefficient estimation calculation and accuracy prediction calculation approaches. This methodology is flexible and scalable, and can be tailored to other experimental situations. To validate the appropriateness of this procedure, a more than sufficient sample of 50 drivers was recruited. The smallest acceptable sample size was determined backwardly, based on the variable coefficient convergence trends of the mean squared error (MSE) curves of the significant variables. Both the clear converging trends of the MSE curves and the proposed method indicated that 30 was an acceptable sample size.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 699
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies
    Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
    CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 2 (04) : 289 - 298
  • [32] Sample Size Estimation in Prevalence Studies
    Ravindra Arya
    Belavendra Antonisamy
    Sushil Kumar
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2012, 79 : 1482 - 1488
  • [33] An introduction to power and sample size estimation
    Jones, SR
    Carley, S
    Harrison, M
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (05) : 453 - 458
  • [34] Sampling, Sample size estimation and Randomisation
    Nongkynrih, Baridalyne
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES, 2012, 3 (02) : 195 - 197
  • [35] Conservative Sample Size Estimation in Nonparametrics
    De Martini, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 21 (01) : 24 - 41
  • [36] Sample size for estimation of the plastochron in pigeonpea
    Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
    Toebe, Marcos
    Facco, Giovani
    dos Santos, Gustavo Oliveira
    Alves, Bruna Mendonca
    Bolzan, Anderson
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2013, 48 : 12 - 18
  • [37] Sample size bias in the estimation of means
    Smith, Andrew R.
    Price, Paul C.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (04) : 499 - 503
  • [38] Sample size estimation for nominal data
    Jerrold Lerman
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997, 44
  • [39] Sample Size Estimation: The Easy Way
    Weller, Susan C.
    FIELD METHODS, 2015, 27 (04) : 333 - 347
  • [40] Sample size bias in the estimation of means
    Andrew R. Smith
    Paul C. Price
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, 17 : 499 - 503