Brain plasticity and age after restoring elbow flexion with distal nerve transfers in neonatal brachial plexus palsy and nonneonatal traumatic brachial plexus injury using the plasticity grading scale

被引:4
|
作者
Socolovsky, Mariano [1 ,3 ]
Lovaglio, Ana [1 ]
Bonilla, Gonzalo [1 ]
Di Masi, Gilda [1 ]
Barillaro, Karina [1 ]
Malessy, Martijn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Hosp Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Leiden Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Buenos Aires, Hosp Clin, Sch Med, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
plasticity grading scale; neuroplasticity score; neonatal brachial plexus palsy; brachial plexus injury; nerve transfer; brain plasticity; peripheral nerve; MUSCULOCUTANEOUS NERVE; BICEPS MUSCLE; PHRENIC-NERVE; REPAIR; INTERCOSTAL; AVULSION; BIRTH;
D O I
10.3171/2023.5.JNS23673
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfers are used to restore elbow flexion following severe neonatal and nonneonatal brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). Restoring volitional control requires plastic changes in the brain. To date, whether the potential for plasticity is influenced by a patient's age remains unknown.METHODS Patients who had presented with a traumatic upper (C5-6 or C5-7) BPI were divided into two groups: neonatal brachial plexus palsies (NBPPs) and nonneonatal traumatic BPIs (NNBPIs). Both groups underwent ulnar or median nerve transfers to the MCN for elbow flexion restoration between January 2002 and July 2020. Only those who attained a British Medical Research Council strength rating of 4 were reviewed. The primary comparison between the two groups was the plasticity grading scale (PGS) score to determine the level of independence of elbow flexion (target) from forearm motor muscle movement (donors). The authors also assessed patient compliance with rehabilitation using a 4-point Rehabilitation Quality Scale. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify intergroup differences.RESULTS In total, 66 patients were analyzed: 22 with NBPP (mean age at surgery 10 months) and 44 with NNBPI (age range at surgery 3-67 years, mean 30.2 years; mean time to surgery 7 months, p < 0.001). All NBPP patients obtained a PGS grade of 4 at the final follow-up versus just 47.7% of NNBPI patients (mean 3.27, p < 0.001). On ordinal regression analysis, after nature of the injury was excluded because of excessive collinearity with age, age was the only significant predictor of plasticity (beta = -0.063, p = 0.003). Median rehabilitation compliance scores were not statistically different between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS The extent of plastic changes that occur for patients to regain volitional control over elbow flexion after upper arm distal nerve transfers following BPI is influenced by patient age, with complete plastic rewiring more likely in younger patients and virtually ubiquitous in infants. Older patients should be informed that elbow flexion after an ulnar or median nerve fascicle transfer to the MCN might require simultaneous wrist flexion.
引用
收藏
页码:1568 / 1575
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] The natural history of recovery of elbow flexion after obstetric brachial plexus injury managed without nerve repair
    Hems, T. E. J.
    Savaridas, T.
    Sherlock, D. A.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (07) : 706 - 709
  • [22] Recovery of Elbow Flexion after Nerve Reconstruction versus Free Functional Muscle Transfer for Late, Traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Systematic Review
    Hoang, Don
    Chen, Vivi W.
    Seruya, Mitchel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (04) : 949 - 959
  • [23] Restoration of elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury:: The role of nerve and muscle transfers -: Discussion by Allen L.!Van Beek, MD
    Gutowski, KA
    Orenstein, HH
    Van Beek, AL
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (06) : 1359 - 1361
  • [24] Distal nerve transfer versus supraclavicular nerve grafting: comparison of elbow flexion outcome in neonatal brachial plexus palsy with C5-C7 involvement
    Heise, Carlos O.
    Siqueira, Mario G.
    Martins, Roberto S.
    Foroni, Luciano H.
    Sterman-Neto, Hugo
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2017, 33 (09) : 1571 - 1574
  • [25] Distal nerve transfer versus supraclavicular nerve grafting: comparison of elbow flexion outcome in neonatal brachial plexus palsy with C5-C7 involvement
    Carlos O. Heise
    Mario G. Siqueira
    Roberto S. Martins
    Luciano H. Foroni
    Hugo Sterman-Neto
    Child's Nervous System, 2017, 33 : 1571 - 1574
  • [26] OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF ELBOW FLEXION STRENGTH AND FATIGABILITY AFTER NERVE TRANSFER IN ADULT TRAUMATIC UPPER BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURIES
    Maricq, Celine
    Jeunehomme, Martine
    Mouraux, Dominique
    Remy, Pascal
    Brassinne, Eric
    Bahm, Jorg
    Schuind, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2014, 19 (03): : 335 - 341
  • [27] RESTORATION OF ELBOW FLEXION USING TENDON TRANSFER AFTER TRAUMATIC PARALYSIS OF THE BRACHIAL-PLEXUS - ON 44 CASES
    ALNOT, JY
    ABOLS, Y
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1984, 70 (04): : 313 - 323
  • [28] Restoration of elbow flexion in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury - a quantitative analysis of results of single versus double nerve transfer
    Srampickal, George Mathew
    Mathew, Anil
    Raveendran, Sreekanth
    Yadav, Bijesh Kumar
    Thomas, Binu Prathap
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (03): : 511 - 515
  • [29] Early Functional Recovery of Elbow Flexion and Supination Following Median and/or Ulnar Nerve Fascicle Transfer in Upper Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy
    Little, Kevin J.
    Zlotolow, Dan A.
    Soldado, Francisco
    Cornwall, Roger
    Kozin, Scott H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (03): : 215 - 221
  • [30] Risk prediction model for unsuccessful elbow flexion recovery after nerve transfer surgery in patients with brachial plexus injury
    Neti, Nutdanai
    Laohaprasitiporn, Panai
    Monteerarat, Yuwarat
    Limthongthang, Roongsak
    Vathana, Torpon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 139 (01) : 212 - 221