Effect of age on presentation and outcome in renal colic

被引:2
|
作者
Golomb, Dor [1 ]
Shemesh, Amit [1 ]
Goldberg, Hanan [2 ]
Shalom, Ben [1 ]
Hen, Eyal [1 ]
Barkai, Eyal [1 ]
Atamna, Fahed [1 ]
Abu Nijmeh, Haitham [1 ]
Cooper, Amir [1 ]
Raz, Orit [1 ]
机构
[1] Samson Assuta Ashdod Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Ashdod, Israel
[2] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Urol, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Renal colic; geriatric renal colic; urolithiasis; ureteral stone; emergency department; KIDNEY-STONES; UROLITHIASIS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/03915603221116992
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the age-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with ureteral stones. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients who visited the ED at a single institution that were found to have a ureteral stone on CT. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected, including outcomes. Patients were subdivided into age groups: 18-30, 31-50, 51-70, and >70years. Results: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 778 patients were admitted to the ED with a ureteral stone. About 78% (609) were males and 22% (169) were females. The mean ages were 49.4 (SD 14.4) and 51.6 (SD 15.7) in males and females, respectively (p= 0.08). Patients in the 36-50 age group, had significantly higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p< 0.0001). Patients older than 70years old presented with significantly higher serum creatinine levels (p< 0.0001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and leukocyte levels (p= 0.002). These patients were also found to have significantly larger stones (mean size of 6.2mm (SD 4.8) (p < 0.0001)). and underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in significantly higher numbers (56.3% vs 43.8%, (p < 0.0001)). Less Less than half of the patients older than 50years were given medical expulsive therapy (MET) with alpha-blockers, compared to more than 50% in the other age groups (p= 0.002). Spontaneous stone expulsion was noted in 70.2% of the 18-35-year group, 62.4% of the 36-50-year-old group, 51.8% of the 51-70-year-old group, and 37% of the >70-year-old group (p < 0.0001). The ED re-admission rates at 7 and 30 days were not significantly different among all age groups. Conclusions: Our data suggests that older patients presented with larger stones, elevated inflammatory markers and creatinine and were more likely to require surgical intervention. The spontaneous stone expulsion rate was inversely associated with age.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AN ATYPICAL RENAL COLIC
    BAGLIN, A
    GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1991, 98 (09): : 10 - 11
  • [42] Imaging of renal colic
    Otal, P
    Irsutti, M
    Chabbert, V
    Murat, C
    Ducassé, JL
    Rousseau, H
    Joffre, F
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2001, 82 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [43] Management of renal colic
    Bultitude, Matthew
    Rees, Jonathan
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [44] Renal colic and lithiasis
    Malbos, Damien
    ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES, 2025, 64 (642): : 51 - 54
  • [45] BILIARY AND RENAL COLIC
    FRENCH, EB
    ROBB, WAT
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1963, (535): : 135 - +
  • [46] Renal Colic in an Adolescent
    Piccoli, Giorgina B.
    Cimmino, Marco A.
    Lamp, Merit
    Gotta, Fabio
    Vigotti, Federica N.
    Priola, Adriano M.
    Veltri, Andrea
    Mandich, Paola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2015, 65 (02) : XVII - XIX
  • [47] Factitious renal colic
    Reich, JD
    Hanno, PM
    UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) : 858 - 862
  • [48] DIET AND RENAL COLIC
    不详
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1950, 144 (08): : 726 - 726
  • [49] IVP IN RENAL COLIC
    MITCHELL, DJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1967, 3 (5559): : 243 - &
  • [50] Acute renal colic
    Miller, DC
    Wolf, JS
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (23): : 2422 - 2422