Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait

被引:21
|
作者
Horsak, Brian [1 ,2 ]
Eichmann, Anna [3 ]
Lauer, Kerstin [3 ]
Prock, Kerstin [1 ]
Krondorfer, Philipp [1 ]
Siragy, Tarique [1 ]
Dumphart, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Digital Hlth & Social Innovat, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
[2] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
[3] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Study Program Gait Anal & Rehabil, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
关键词
Markerless motion capture; Gait analysis; Pose estimation; Deep learning; OpenCap; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111801
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Markerless motion capturing has the potential to provide a low-cost and accessible alternative to traditional marker-based systems for real-world biomechanical assessment. However, before these systems can be put into practice, we need to rigorously evaluate their accuracy in estimating joint kinematics for various gait patterns. This study evaluated the accuracy of a low-cost, open-source, and smartphone-based markerless motion capture system, namely OpenCap, for measuring 3D joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait compared to a marker-based system. 21 healthy volunteers were instructed to walk with four different gait patterns: physiological, crouch, circumduction, and equinus gait. Three-dimensional kinematic data were simultaneously recorded using the markerless and a marker-based motion capture system. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the peak error were calculated between every joint kinematic variable obtained by both systems. We found an overall RMSE of 5.8 (SD: 1.8 degrees) and a peak error of 11.3 degrees (SD: 3.9). A repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc tests indicated significant differences in RMSE and peak errors between the four gait patterns (p < 0.05). Physiological gait presented the lowest, crouch and circumduction gait the highest errors. Our findings indicate a roughly comparable accuracy to IMU-based approaches and commercial markerless multi-camera solutions. However, errors are still above clinically desirable thresholds of two to five degrees. While our findings highlight the potential of markerless systems for assessing gait kinematics, they also underpin the need to further improve the underlying deep learning algorithms to make markerless pose estimation a valuable tool in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] A comparison of lower body gait kinematics and kinetics between Theia3D markerless and marker-based models in healthy subjects and clinical patients
    D'Souza, Sonia
    Siebert, Tobias
    Fohanno, Vincent
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [22] Validity of artificial intelligence-based markerless motion capture system for clinical gait analysis: Spatiotemporal results in healthy adults and adults with Parkinson's disease
    Ripic, Zachary
    Signorile, Joseph F.
    Best, Thomas M.
    Jacobs, Kevin A.
    Nienhuis, Mitch
    Whitelaw, Cole
    Moenning, Caden
    Eltoukhy, Moataz
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 155
  • [23] A Novel Method for Designing Motion Profiles Based on a Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Using the Hip Joint Angles of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Robot
    Song, Buchun
    Lee, Dongyoung
    Park, Sang Yong
    Baek, Yoon Su
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (19):
  • [24] Comparison between Theia3D markerless and CAST model marker-based systems in pathological lower-body 3D gait kinematics in adults and children
    D'Souza, Sonia
    Fohanno, Vincent
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2023, 100 : 40 - 41