Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait

被引:21
|
作者
Horsak, Brian [1 ,2 ]
Eichmann, Anna [3 ]
Lauer, Kerstin [3 ]
Prock, Kerstin [1 ]
Krondorfer, Philipp [1 ]
Siragy, Tarique [1 ]
Dumphart, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Digital Hlth & Social Innovat, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
[2] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
[3] St Polten Univ Appl Sci, Study Program Gait Anal & Rehabil, Campus Pl 1, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
关键词
Markerless motion capture; Gait analysis; Pose estimation; Deep learning; OpenCap; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111801
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Markerless motion capturing has the potential to provide a low-cost and accessible alternative to traditional marker-based systems for real-world biomechanical assessment. However, before these systems can be put into practice, we need to rigorously evaluate their accuracy in estimating joint kinematics for various gait patterns. This study evaluated the accuracy of a low-cost, open-source, and smartphone-based markerless motion capture system, namely OpenCap, for measuring 3D joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait compared to a marker-based system. 21 healthy volunteers were instructed to walk with four different gait patterns: physiological, crouch, circumduction, and equinus gait. Three-dimensional kinematic data were simultaneously recorded using the markerless and a marker-based motion capture system. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the peak error were calculated between every joint kinematic variable obtained by both systems. We found an overall RMSE of 5.8 (SD: 1.8 degrees) and a peak error of 11.3 degrees (SD: 3.9). A repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc tests indicated significant differences in RMSE and peak errors between the four gait patterns (p < 0.05). Physiological gait presented the lowest, crouch and circumduction gait the highest errors. Our findings indicate a roughly comparable accuracy to IMU-based approaches and commercial markerless multi-camera solutions. However, errors are still above clinically desirable thresholds of two to five degrees. While our findings highlight the potential of markerless systems for assessing gait kinematics, they also underpin the need to further improve the underlying deep learning algorithms to make markerless pose estimation a valuable tool in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a smartphone-based markerless system to measure lower-limb kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Wang, Junqing
    Xu, Wei
    Wu, Zhuoying
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Biao
    Zhou, Zongke
    Wang, Chen
    Li, Kang
    Nie, Yong
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2025, 181
  • [2] Comparison of the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Lower Limb Gait Kinematics
    Andreoni, Giuseppe
    Molteni, Luca E.
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, PT II, DHM 2024, 2024, 14710 : 3 - 15
  • [3] Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture
    Kanko, M. Robert
    Laende, K. Elise
    Davis, M. Elysia
    Selbie, W. Scott
    Deluzio, J. Kevin
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 127
  • [4] AI-smartphone markerless motion capturing of hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics during countermovement jumps
    Barzyk, Philipp
    Zimmermann, Philip
    Stein, Manuel
    Keim, Daniel
    Gruber, Markus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2024, 24 (10) : 1452 - 1462
  • [5] Reliability and validity of lower limb joint range of motion measurements using a smartphone
    Miyachi, Yousuke
    Ito, Morihiro
    Furuta, Kunihiro
    Ban, Rua
    Hanamura, Shuntaro
    Kamiya, Mitsuhiro
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (01): : 7 - 18
  • [6] Validity and reliability of trunk and lower-limb kinematics during squatting, hopping, jumping and side-stepping using OpenCap markerless motion capture application
    Lima, Yuri Lopes
    Collings, Tyler
    Hall, Michelle
    Bourne, Matthew N.
    Diamond, Laura E.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2024, 42 (19) : 1847 - 1858
  • [7] Validity and reliability of a smartphone motion analysis app for lower limb kinematics during treadmill running
    Mousavi, Seyed Hamed
    Hijmans, Juha M.
    Moeini, Forough
    Rajabi, Reza
    Ferber, Reed
    van der Worp, Henk
    Zwerver, Johannes
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2020, 43 : 27 - 35
  • [8] Comparison of kinematics and joint moments calculations for lower limbs during gait using markerless and marker-based motion capture
    Huang, Tianchen
    Ruan, Mianfang
    Huang, Shangjun
    Fan, Linlin
    Wu, Xie
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [9] Concurrent validity and reliability of a smartphone-based application for the head repositioning and cervical range of motion
    Romero-Franco, Natalia
    Oliva-Pascual-Vaca, Angel
    Fernandez-Dominguez, Juan Carlos
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2023, 68 (02): : 125 - 132
  • [10] Validity of Wearable Gait Analysis System for Measuring Lower-Limb Kinematics during Timed Up and Go Test
    Kataoka, Yoshiaki
    Ishida, Tomoya
    Osuka, Satoshi
    Takeda, Ryo
    Tadano, Shigeru
    Yamada, Satoshi
    Tohyama, Harukazu
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (19)