Model predictive control of a dual fluidized bed gasification plant

被引:6
|
作者
Stanger, Lukas [1 ]
Bartik, Alexander [2 ]
Hammerschmid, Martin [2 ]
Jankovic, Stefan [3 ]
Benedikt, Florian [2 ]
Mueller, Stefan [2 ,3 ]
Schirrer, Alexander [1 ]
Jakubek, Stefan [1 ]
Kozek, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Wien, Inst Mech & Mechatron, Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
[2] TU Wien, Inst Chem Environm & Biosci Engn, Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
[3] Verto Engn GmbH, Franz Josefs Kai 53-13, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Model predictive control; Automatic control; DFB; Gasification; Biomass; Fluidized bed; PRODUCT GAS QUALITY; STEAM GASIFICATION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122917
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Dual fluidized bed (DFB) gasification is a promising method for producing valuable gaseous energy carriers from biogenic feedstocks as a substitute for fossil fuels. State-of-the-art DFB gasification plants mainly rely on manual operation or single -input single -output control loops, and scientific contributions only exist for controlling individual process variables. This leaves a research gap in terms of comprehensive control strategies for DFB gasification. To address this gap, we propose a multivariate control strategy that focuses on crucial process variables, such as product gas quantity, gasification temperature, and bed material circulation rate. Our approach utilizes model predictive control (MPC), which enables effective process control while explicitly considering process constraints. A simulation study is given demonstrating how different MPC parametrizations influence the behavior of the closed -loop system. Experimental results from a 100 kW pilot plant at TU Wien demonstrate the successful control achieved by the proposed control algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Kinetic Model of Steam Gasification of Biomass in a Dual Fluidized Bed Reactor: Comparison with Pilot-Plant Experimental Results
    Hejazi, Bijan
    Grace, John R.
    Bi, Xiaotao
    Mahecha-Botero, Andres
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (11) : 12141 - 12155
  • [22] Model predictive control of circulating fluidized bed coal combustor
    Li Shi
    Hu Yan
    Zong Xiju
    ADVANCES IN MECHATRONICS, AUTOMATION AND APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 846-847 : 73 - 76
  • [23] CFD modeling of the flow dynamics and gasification in the combustor and gasifier of a dual fluidized bed pilot plant
    Wan, Zhanghao
    Yang, Shiliang
    Wei, Yonggang
    Hu, Jianhang
    Wang, Hua
    ENERGY, 2020, 198
  • [24] Influence of different bed material mixtures on dual fluidized bed steam gasification
    Mauerhofer, A. M.
    Benedikt, F.
    Schmid, J. C.
    Fuchs, J.
    Mueller, S.
    Hofbauer, H.
    ENERGY, 2018, 157 : 957 - 968
  • [25] The mechanism of bed material coating in dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasification plants and its impact on plant optimization
    Kirnbauer, Friedrich
    Hofbauer, Hermann
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 245 : 94 - 104
  • [26] Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review
    Karl, Juergen
    Proell, Tobias
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 : 64 - 78
  • [27] Upscaling Effects on Char Conversion in Dual Fluidized Bed Gasification
    Lundberg, Louise
    Pallares, David
    Thunman, Henrik
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2018, 32 (05) : 5933 - 5943
  • [28] The Effect of Bed Particle Inventories with Different Particle Sizes in a Dual Fluidized Bed Pilot Plant for Biomass Steam Gasification
    Koppatz, Stefan
    Schmid, Johannes C.
    Pfeifer, Christoph
    Hofbauer, Hermann
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (31) : 10492 - 10502
  • [29] Some process fundamentals of biomass gasification in dual fluidized bed
    Murakami, Takahiro
    Xu, Guangwen
    Suda, Toshiyuki
    Matsuzawa, Yoshiaki
    Tani, Hidehisa
    Fujimori, Toshiro
    FUEL, 2007, 86 (1-2) : 244 - 255
  • [30] Simple Model and Predictive Control of a Pharmaceutical Batch Fluidized Bed Dryer
    Gagnon, Francis
    Desbiens, Andre
    Poulin, Eric
    Bouchard, Jocelyn
    Lapointe-Garant, Pierre-Philippe
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (03): : 7 - 12