Machine Learning Analysis of RNA-seq Data for Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction of Colon Cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Bostanci, Erkan [1 ]
Kocak, Engin [2 ]
Unal, Metehan [1 ]
Guzel, Mehmet Serdar [1 ]
Acici, Koray [3 ]
Asuroglu, Tunc [4 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Gulhane Pharm, Dept Analyt Chem, TR-06018 Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Ankara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Artificial Intelligence & Data Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere 33720, Finland
关键词
transcriptomics; RNA-seq; machine learning; deep learning; classification; cancer prediction; exRNA; CLASSIFICATION; AGREEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/s23063080
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Data from omics studies have been used for prediction and classification of various diseases in biomedical and bioinformatics research. In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been used in many different fields related to healthcare systems, especially for disease prediction and classification tasks. Integration of molecular omics data with ML algorithms has offered a great opportunity to evaluate clinical data. RNA sequence (RNA-seq) analysis has been emerged as the gold standard for transcriptomics analysis. Currently, it is being used widely in clinical research. In our present work, RNA-seq data of extracellular vesicles (EV) from healthy and colon cancer patients are analyzed. Our aim is to develop models for prediction and classification of colon cancer stages. Five different canonical ML and Deep Learning (DL) classifiers are used to predict colon cancer of an individual with processed RNA-seq data. The classes of data are formed on the basis of both colon cancer stages and cancer presence (healthy or cancer). The canonical ML classifiers, which are k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Logistic Model Tree (LMT), Random Tree (RT), Random Committee (RC), and Random Forest (RF), are tested with both forms of the data. In addition, to compare the performance with canonical ML models, One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1-D CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) DL models are utilized. Hyper-parameter optimizations of DL models are constructed by using genetic meta-heuristic optimization algorithm (GA). The best accuracy in cancer prediction is obtained with RC, LMT, and RF canonical ML algorithms as 97.33%. However, RT and kNN show 95.33% performance. The best accuracy in cancer stage classification is achieved with RF as 97.33%. This result is followed by LMT, RC, kNN, and RT with 96.33%, 96%, 94.66%, and 94%, respectively. According to the results of the experiments with DL algorithms, the best accuracy in cancer prediction is obtained with 1-D CNN as 97.67%. BiLSTM and LSTM show 94.33% and 93.67% performance, respectively. In classification of the cancer stages, the best accuracy is achieved with BiLSTM as 98%. 1-D CNN and LSTM show 97% and 94.33% performance, respectively. The results reveal that both canonical ML and DL models may outperform each other for different numbers of features.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of Biomarkers to Differentiate Asthma and COPD Using RNA-seq Data: A Machine Learning Approach
    Liao, S.
    Linderholm, A.
    Yoneda, K. Y.
    Kenyon, N. J.
    Harper, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [42] Impact of RNA-seq data analysis algorithms on gene expression estimation and downstream prediction
    Tong, Li
    Wu, Po-Yen
    Phan, John H.
    Hassazadeh, Hamid R.
    Tong, Weida
    Wang, May D.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [43] Impact of RNA-seq data analysis algorithms on gene expression estimation and downstream prediction
    Li Tong
    Po-Yen Wu
    John H. Phan
    Hamid R. Hassazadeh
    Weida Tong
    May D. Wang
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [44] Oqtans: a multifunctional workbench for RNA-seq data analysis
    Sreedharan, Vipin T.
    Schultheiss, Sebastian J.
    Jean, Geraldine
    Kahles, Andre
    Bohnert, Regina
    Drewe, Philipp
    Mudrakarta, Pramod
    Goernitz, Nico
    Zeller, Georg
    Raetsch, Gunnar
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 15
  • [45] Deep Learning to Analyze RNA-Seq Gene Expression Data
    Urda, D.
    Montes-Torres, J.
    Moreno, F.
    Franco, L.
    Jerez, J. M.
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, IWANN 2017, PT II, 2017, 10306 : 50 - 59
  • [46] Differential expression analysis for paired RNA-seq data
    Chung, Lisa M.
    Ferguson, John P.
    Zheng, Wei
    Qian, Feng
    Bruno, Vincent
    Montgomery, Ruth R.
    Zhao, Hongyu
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14 : 110
  • [47] Improving the Flexibility of RNA-Seq Data Analysis Pipelines
    Phan, John H.
    Wu, Po-Yen
    Wang, May D.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GENOMIC SIGNAL PROCESSING AND STATISTICS (GENSIPS), 2012, : 70 - 73
  • [48] Transforming RNA-Seq Data to Improve the Performance of Prognostic Gene Signatures
    Zwiener, Isabella
    Frisch, Barbara
    Binder, Harald
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [49] Computational analysis of alternative polyadenylation from standard RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq data
    Gao, Yipeng
    Li, Wei
    MRNA 3' END PROCESSING AND METABOLISM, 2021, 655 : 225 - 243
  • [50] PUseqClust: A Clustering Analysis Method for RNA-Seq Data
    Shi X.-F.
    Liu X.-J.
    Zhang L.
    Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2019, 30 (09): : 2857 - 2868