Convolutional - recurrent neural network proxy for robust optimization and closed-loop reservoir management

被引:12
|
作者
Kim, Yong Do [1 ]
Durlofsky, Louis J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Closed-loop reservoir management; Robust production optimization; Convolutional neural network; Recurrent neural network; Proxy; Reservoir simulation; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SURROGATE-MODEL; WELL; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-022-10189-9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Production optimization under geological uncertainty is computationally expensive, as a large number of well control schedules must be evaluated over multiple geological realizations. In this work, a convolutional-recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN) proxy model is developed to predict well-by-well oil and water rates, for given time-varying well bottom-hole pressure (BHP) schedules, for each realization in an ensemble. This capability enables the estimation of the objective function and nonlinear constraint values required for robust optimization. The proxy model represents an extension of a recently developed long short-term memory (LSTM) RNN proxy designed to predict well rates for a single geomodel. A CNN is introduced here to processes permeability realizations, and this provides the initial states for the RNN. The CNN-RNN proxy is trained using simulation results for 300 different sets of BHP schedules and permeability realizations. We demonstrate proxy accuracy for oil-water flow through multiple realizations of 3D multi-Gaussian permeability models. The proxy is then incorporated into a closed-loop reservoir management (CLRM) workflow, where it is used with particle swarm optimization and a filter-based method for nonlinear constraint satisfaction. History matching is achieved using an adjoint-gradient-based procedure. The proxy model is shown to perform well in this setting for five different (synthetic) 'true' models. Improved net present value along with constraint satisfaction and uncertainty reduction are observed with CLRM. For the robust production optimization steps, the proxy provides O(100) runtime speedup over simulation-based optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 202
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Convolutional – recurrent neural network proxy for robust optimization and closed-loop reservoir management
    Yong Do Kim
    Louis J. Durlofsky
    Computational Geosciences, 2023, 27 : 179 - 202
  • [2] Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management
    Wang, Chunhong
    Li, Gaoming
    Reynolds, Albert C.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2009, 14 (03): : 506 - 523
  • [3] Closed-loop reservoir management - Preface
    Jansen, JD
    Durlofsky, L
    Aziz, K
    van Kruijsdijk, C
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2006, 10 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [4] A review of closed-loop reservoir management
    Jian Hou
    Kang Zhou
    XianSong Zhang
    XiaoDong Kang
    Hai Xie
    Petroleum Science, 2015, 12 (01) : 114 - 128
  • [5] A review of closed-loop reservoir management
    Hou, Jian
    Zhou, Kang
    Zhang, Xian-Song
    Kang, Xiao-Dong
    Xie, Hai
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2015, 12 (01) : 114 - 128
  • [6] Performance Analysis for Closed-Loop Reservoir Management
    Foss, Bjarne
    Jensen, John Petter
    SPE JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (01): : 183 - 190
  • [7] Value of information in closed-loop reservoir management
    E. G. D. Barros
    P. M. J. Van den Hof
    J. D. Jansen
    Computational Geosciences, 2016, 20 : 737 - 749
  • [8] Value of information in closed-loop reservoir management
    Barros, E. G. D.
    Van den Hof, P. M. J.
    Jansen, J. D.
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 20 (03) : 737 - 749
  • [9] Closed-loop detection of mobile robot based on quaternion convolutional neural network
    Zhang X.
    Zhang Y.
    Su X.
    Zhongguo Guanxing Jishu Xuebao/Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2019, 27 (03): : 357 - 365
  • [10] Comprehensive framework for gradient-based optimization in closed-loop reservoir management
    Vladislav Bukshtynov
    Oleg Volkov
    Louis J. Durlofsky
    Khalid Aziz
    Computational Geosciences, 2015, 19 : 877 - 897