Persistent somatic symptom related stigmatisation by healthcare professionals: A systematic review of questionnaire measurement instruments

被引:8
|
作者
McGhie-Fraser, Brodie [1 ,7 ]
Lucassen, Peter [1 ]
Ballering, Aranka [2 ]
Abma, Inger [3 ]
Brouwers, Evelien [4 ]
van Dulmen, Sandra [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Hartman, Tim Olde [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Serv Res, Dept Primary & Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Psychiat, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tranzo Sci Ctr Care & Wellbeing, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Nivel Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Boras, Fac Caring Sci, Work Life & Social Welf, Boras, Sweden
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Serv Res, Dept Primary Community Care 117, Geert Grootepl Zuid 21, NL-6525 EZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Persistent somatic symptoms; Stigma; Stereotype; Prejudice; Discrimination; Questionnaire; Measurement instrument; Measurement properties; MEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS; LOW-BACK-PAIN; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; CHRONIC-FATIGUE-SYNDROME; PRACTITIONERS ATTITUDES; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; PROVIDERS ATTITUDES; PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111161
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) experience stigmatising attitudes and behaviours by healthcare professionals. While previous research has focussed on individual manifestations of PSS related stigma, less is known about sound ways to measure stigmatisation by healthcare professionals towards patients with PSS. This review aims to assess the quality of questionnaire measurement instruments and make recom-mendations about their use.Methods: A systematic review using six databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey and EThOS). The search strategy combined three search strings related to healthcare professionals, PSS and stigma. Additional publications were identified by searching bibliographies. Three authors independently extracted the data. Data analysis and synthesis followed COSMIN methodology for reviews of outcome measurement instruments.Results: We identified 90 publications that met the inclusion criteria using 62 questionnaire measurement in-struments. Stereotypes were explored in 92% of instruments, prejudices in 52% of instruments, and discrimi-nation in 19% of instruments. The development process of the instruments was not rated higher than doubtful. Construct validity, structural validity, internal consistency and reliability were the most commonly investigated measurement properties. Evidence around content validity was inconsistent or indeterminate.Conclusion: No instrument provided acceptable evidence on all measurement properties. Many instruments were developed for use within a single publication, with little evidence of their development or establishment of content validity. This is problematic because stigma instruments should reflect the challenges that healthcare professionals face when working with patients with PSS. They should also reflect the experiences that patients with PSS have widely reported during clinical encounters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Healthcare professionals' competence in digitalisation: A systematic review
    Konttila, Jenni
    Siira, Heidi
    Kyngas, Helvi
    Lahtinen, Minna
    Elo, Satu
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Kaakinen, Pirjo
    Oikarinen, Anne
    Yamakawa, Miyae
    Fukui, Sakiko
    Utsumi, Momoe
    Higami, Yoko
    Higuchi, Akari
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (5-6) : 745 - 761
  • [22] Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Chloë FitzGerald
    Samia Hurst
    BMC Medical Ethics, 18
  • [23] Resilience of primary healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Robertson, Helen D.
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Burton, Christopher
    Iversen, Lisa
    Murchie, Peter
    Porteous, Terry
    Matheson, Catriona
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (647): : E423 - E433
  • [24] Resilience in palliative healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Zanatta, Francesco
    Maffoni, Marina
    Giardini, Anna
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (03) : 971 - 978
  • [25] Resilience in palliative healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Francesco Zanatta
    Marina Maffoni
    Anna Giardini
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020, 28 : 971 - 978
  • [26] A systematic review of consumers' and healthcare professionals' trust in digital healthcare
    Catapan, Soraia de Camargo
    Sazon, Hannah
    Zheng, Sophie
    Gallegos-Rejas, Victor
    Mendis, Roshni
    Santiago, Pedro H. R.
    Kelly, Jaimon T.
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2025, 8 (01):
  • [27] Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties
    Landsverk, Nils Gunnar
    Olsen, Nina Rydland
    Broyold, Therese
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [28] Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties
    Nils Gunnar Landsverk
    Nina Rydland Olsen
    Therese Brovold
    Implementation Science, 18
  • [29] A comprehensive examination of research instruments utilized for assessing the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of restraints in mental healthcare: A systematic review
    Bachmann, Liv
    Odegard, Atle
    Mundal, Ingunn Pernille
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (07) : 2728 - 2745
  • [30] Diabetes-related emotional distress instruments: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    Moon, Seung Hei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (12) : 1868 - 1878