Psychological assessment of AI-based decision support systems: tool development and expected benefits

被引:0
|
作者
Buschmeyer, Katharina [1 ]
Hatfield, Sarah [1 ]
Zenner, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Augsburg Tech Univ Appl Sci, Fac Business, Augsburg, Germany
[2] Augsburg Tech Univ Appl Sci, Fac Liberal Arts & Sci, Augsburg, Germany
来源
关键词
AI-based decision support systems; work; human-centered evaluation; survey inventory; system properties; characteristics of the supported task; psychological load; INFORMATION OVERLOAD; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; AGENT TRANSPARENCY; USER SATISFACTION; IMPACT; WORK; PERFORMANCE; USABILITY; EASE; FIT;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2023.1249322
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop an evaluation tool that assesses the use of AI-based decision support systems (DSSs) in professional practice from a human-centered perspective. Following the International Organization for Standardization, this perspective aims to ensure that the use of interactive technologies improves users' psychological load experience and behavior, e.g., in the form of reduced stress experience or increased performance. Concomitantly, this perspective attempts to proactively prevent or detect and correct the potential negative effects of these technologies on user load, such as impaired satisfaction and engagement, as early as possible. Based on this perspective, we developed and validated a questionnaire instrument, the Psychological Assessment of AI-based DSSs (PAAI), for the user-centered evaluation of the use of AI-based DSSs in practice. In particular, the instrument considers central design characteristics of AI-based DSSs and the corresponding work situation, which have a significant impact on users' psychological load. The instrument was tested in two independent studies. In Study 1, N = 223 individuals were recruited. Based on the results of item and scale analyses and an exploratory factor analysis, the newly developed instrument was refined, and the final version was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. Findings showed acceptable-to-good fit indices, confirming the factorial validity of the PAAI. This was confirmed in a second study, which had N = 471 participants. Again, the CFA yielded acceptable-to-good fit indices. The validity was further confirmed using convergent and criterion validity analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AI Systems Engineering - systematic development and operation of AI-based systems
    Beyerer, Juergen
    Pfrommer, Julius
    Uslaender, Thomas
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2022, 70 (09) : 753 - 755
  • [22] AN AI-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR NAVAL SHIP DESIGN
    HARTMAN, PJ
    CHOU, YC
    BENJAMIN, CO
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1992, 104 (04) : 106 - 108
  • [23] AN AI-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR NAVAL SHIP DESIGN
    CHOU, YC
    BENJAMIN, CO
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1992, 104 (03) : 156 - 165
  • [25] Assuring the safety of AI-based clinical decision support systems: a case study of the AI Clinician for sepsis treatment
    Festor, Paul
    Jia, Yan
    Gordon, Anthony C.
    Faisal, A. Aldo
    Habli, Ibrahim
    Komorowski, Matthieu
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2022, 29 (01)
  • [26] Collaborative strategies for deploying AI-based physician decision support systems: challenges and deployment approaches
    Mirja Mittermaier
    Marium Raza
    Joseph C. Kvedar
    npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [27] Collaborative strategies for deploying AI-based physician decision support systems: challenges and deployment approaches
    Mittermaier, Mirja
    Raza, Marium
    Kvedar, Joseph C.
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [28] Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study
    Giebel, Godwin Denk
    Raszke, Pascal
    Nowak, Hartmuth
    Palmowski, Lars
    Adamzik, Michael
    Heinz, Philipp
    Tokic, Marianne
    Timmesfeld, Nina
    Brunkhorst, Frank
    Wasem, Juergen
    Blase, Nikola
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [29] Information Model to Advance Explainable AI-Based Decision Support Systems in Manufacturing System Design
    Cochran, David S.
    Smith, Joseph
    Mark, Benedikt G.
    Rauch, Erwin
    MANAGING AND IMPLEMENTING THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, ISIEA 2022, 2022, 525 : 49 - 60
  • [30] Responsible MLOps Design Methodology for an Auditing System for AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Barnard, Pepita
    Bautista, John Robert
    Dakhama, Aidan
    Farahi, Arya
    Laos, Kazim
    Liu, Anqi
    Menendez, Hector D.
    TESTING SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS, ICTSS 2024, 2025, 15383 : 217 - 236