The Paradoxical Effect of Digital Transformation on Innovation Performance: Does Risk-Taking Matter?

被引:15
|
作者
Li, Ruijie [1 ]
Fu, Lihua [2 ]
Liu, Zhiying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital transformation; Technological innovation; Dynamics; Dynamic scheduling; Companies; Production; Manufacturing; digitalization paradox; dynamic capability theory; innovation performance; organizational inertia; risk-taking; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; FIRM INNOVATION; VALUE CREATION; INERTIA; GROWTH; STATE; MODEL; SMES;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2023.3339341
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of enterprises' digital transformation on innovation performance has attracted the attention of enterprises and scholars. The positive effects of digital transformation are well described in the literature, but the dark side of digital transformation and the digitalization paradox have been less explored. Meanwhile, the role of risk-taking seems to have been ignored. From the perspectives of dynamic capability theory and organizational inertia theory, this study explores the double-edged sword effect of enterprise digital transformation on innovation performance and the moderating role of the risk-taking level. Based on data from computer, communication, and other electronic equipment manufacturing sector companies listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2007 to 2020, the empirical results indicate that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between digital transformation and innovation performance, and the corporate risk-taking level positively moderates the relationship such that the inverted-U shape becomes steeper (more positive for low degrees of digital transformation and more negative for high degrees of digital transformation) in enterprises with a high risk-taking level compared to enterprises with a low risk-taking level. This study enriches the current theoretical explanation of the digitalization paradox and provides practical inspiration for enterprises to implement digital transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:3308 / 3324
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Pulling together: Does supplier digital transformation affect customer risk-taking capability?
    Liu, Qinghan
    Ren, Zongqiang
    Liu, Qiuzi
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024, 45 (03) : 1659 - 1676
  • [12] How does digital transformation affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China
    Feng, Xiaocui
    Yu, Ruiqing
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 97
  • [13] Digital transformation, monetary policy and risk-taking of banks
    Ding, Qiaoying
    He, Wensheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 55
  • [14] Does local religiosity matter for bank risk-taking?
    Adhikari, Binay Kumar
    Agrawal, Anup
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 38 : 272 - 293
  • [15] Climate transition risk and bank risk-taking: The role of digital transformation
    Liu, Zhonglu
    Li, Jun
    Sun, Haibo
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 61
  • [16] Strategy choices in strategic risk-taking: Does climate risk matter?
    Li, Wanli
    Luo, Dan
    Cheng, Teng-Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 97
  • [17] Risk-Taking Tendencies in Prisoners and Nonprisoners: Does Gender Matter?
    Wichary, Szymon
    Pachur, Thorsten
    Li, Mengduo
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 28 (05) : 504 - 514
  • [18] Corporate social responsibility: does risk-taking attitude matter?
    Hartmann, Caroline C.
    Chen, Chu
    Hayek, Mario
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2024,
  • [19] Family-firm risk-taking: Does religion matter?
    Jiang, Fuxiu
    Jiang, Zhan
    Kim, Kenneth A.
    Zhang, Min
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 33 : 260 - 278
  • [20] Risk-taking and others Does the social reference point matter?
    Lindskog, Annika
    Martinsson, Peter
    Medhin, Haileselassie
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2022, 64 (03) : 287 - 307