Quantile connectedness and the determinants between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from China

被引:14
|
作者
Chen, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Gang-Jin [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, You [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Chi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Uddin, Gazi Salah [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Finance & Investment Management, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Econ & Publ Policy CCEPP, Cambridge, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FinTech; Financial institutions; Quantile connectedness; Determinants; Risk spillovers; Exponential random graph model; IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMIC RISK; STOCK MARKETS; VOLATILITY SPILLOVER; GRANGER CAUSALITY; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; STABILITY; BANKING; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100906
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the connectedness and risk spillovers between Chinese FinTech and traditional financial institutions by using quantile-based vector autoregression (QVAR) networks. Specifically, by using daily data from January 2014 to June 2022, we focus on system-, sector-, and institution-level quantile connectedness characteristics, with the following findings. At the system level, the QVAR networks linking FinTech and traditional financial institutions are more connected at the extreme quantiles than at the median quantile. At the sector level, banks, real estate firms, and FinTech sectors act as net risk receivers, whereas securities and insurers act as net risk emitters. At the institutional level, risk transmission and reception of institutions significantly increase when market conditions rapidly change. We also investigate the determinants of quantile connectedness by using an exponential random graph model and find that (i) across different quantiles, the book-to-market and return on equity of institutions have a positive impact on their risk spillovers; (ii) at the extreme quantiles, the book-to-market is more pronounced than the return on equity; and (iii) at the median quantile, banks and FinTech institutions are more connected than insurers, real estate firms, securities, and other financials.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The social representation of fintech from the perspective of traditional financial sector professionals: evidence from Brazil
    Joia, Luiz Antonio
    Proenca, Rodrigo
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [32] Dynamic spillovers between Shanghai crude oil futures and China's green markets: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile connectedness approach
    Liu, Min
    Liu, Hongfei
    Ping, Weiying
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 85 : 78 - 93
  • [33] Quantile return connectedness of theme factors and portfolio implications: Evidence from the US and China
    Shi, Huai-Long
    Chen, Huayi
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 64
  • [34] How does the development of fintech affect financial efficiency? Evidence from China
    Wu, Yi Hu
    Bai, Liang
    Chen, Xiaohui
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, : 2980 - 2998
  • [35] The connectedness between meme tokens, meme stocks, and other asset classes: Evidence from a quantile connectedness approach
    Yousaf, Imran
    Pham, Linh
    Goodell, John W.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2023, 82
  • [36] Time-Frequency Connectedness between Green Bonds and Conventional Financial Markets: Evidence from China
    Chen, Yingliang
    Shi, Guifen
    Hou, Guanchong
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2024, 2024
  • [37] Dynamic spillovers and asymmetric connectedness between fossil energy and green financial markets: Evidence from China
    Deng, Jing
    Guan, Siying
    Zheng, Huike
    Xing, Xiaoyun
    Liu, Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [38] Extreme risk spillovers among traditional financial and FinTech institutions: A complex network perspective
    Wen, Shigang
    Li, Jianping
    Huang, Chuangxia
    Zhu, Xiaoqian
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 190 - 202
  • [39] How Traditional Financial Institutions have adapted to Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and FinTech?
    Sharbek, Nermin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 16 (01): : 837 - 848
  • [40] Financial Constraints, Institutions, and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China
    Wang, Yang
    Kong, Qunxi
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2019, 55 (11) : 2652 - 2667