Quantile connectedness and the determinants between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from China

被引:14
|
作者
Chen, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Gang-Jin [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, You [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Chi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Uddin, Gazi Salah [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Finance & Investment Management, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Econ & Publ Policy CCEPP, Cambridge, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FinTech; Financial institutions; Quantile connectedness; Determinants; Risk spillovers; Exponential random graph model; IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMIC RISK; STOCK MARKETS; VOLATILITY SPILLOVER; GRANGER CAUSALITY; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; STABILITY; BANKING; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100906
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the connectedness and risk spillovers between Chinese FinTech and traditional financial institutions by using quantile-based vector autoregression (QVAR) networks. Specifically, by using daily data from January 2014 to June 2022, we focus on system-, sector-, and institution-level quantile connectedness characteristics, with the following findings. At the system level, the QVAR networks linking FinTech and traditional financial institutions are more connected at the extreme quantiles than at the median quantile. At the sector level, banks, real estate firms, and FinTech sectors act as net risk receivers, whereas securities and insurers act as net risk emitters. At the institutional level, risk transmission and reception of institutions significantly increase when market conditions rapidly change. We also investigate the determinants of quantile connectedness by using an exponential random graph model and find that (i) across different quantiles, the book-to-market and return on equity of institutions have a positive impact on their risk spillovers; (ii) at the extreme quantiles, the book-to-market is more pronounced than the return on equity; and (iii) at the median quantile, banks and FinTech institutions are more connected than insurers, real estate firms, securities, and other financials.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volatility Spillover Dynamics and Determinants between FinTech and Traditional Financial Industry: Evidence from China
    Wang, Ziyao
    Xia, Yufei
    Fu, Yating
    Liu, Ying
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (19)
  • [2] Dynamic connectedness between China green bond, carbon market and traditional financial markets: Evidence from quantile connectedness approach
    Zhang, He
    Gong, Zhenting
    Yang, Yunglieh
    Chen, Fan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [3] Determinants of connectedness in financial institutions: Evidence from Taiwan
    Chen, Yi-Pei
    Chen, Yu-Lun
    Chiang, Shu-Hen
    Mo, Wan-Shin
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 55
  • [4] Volatility spillover dynamics between fintech and traditional financial industries and their rich determinants: New evidence from Chinese listed institutions
    Liu, Chengcheng
    Tian, Meng
    Huang, Bai
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 101
  • [5] Risk spillovers between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from the U.S
    Li, Jianping
    Li, Jingyu
    Zhu, Xiaoqian
    Yao, Yinhong
    Casu, Barbara
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 71
  • [6] Business connectedness or market risk? Evidence from financial institutions in China
    Liang, Qi
    Lu, Yanchen
    Li, Zheng
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 62
  • [7] FinTech and financial development: the role of traditional financial institutions
    Emuron, Abraham
    van der Nest, D. P.
    Coffie, Cephas Paa Kwasi
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 15 (04) : 704 - 719
  • [8] Connectedness and systemic risk between FinTech and traditional financial stocks: Implications for portfolio diversification
    Henriques, Irene
    Sadorsky, Perry
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 73
  • [9] Fintech, regtech, and financial development: evidence from China
    Tadiwanashe Muganyi
    Linnan Yan
    Yingkai Yin
    Huaping Sun
    Xiangbin Gong
    Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [10] Fintech, financial constraints and innovation: Evidence from China
    Ding, Na
    Gu, Leilei
    Peng, Yuchao
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 73